meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
City Journal Audio

Trump Says the Smithsonian Is Too Negative. Is He Right?

City Journal Audio

Manhattan Institute

Politics, News Commentary, News

4.8615 Ratings

🗓️ 21 August 2025

⏱️ 35 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Charles Fain Lehman, Neetu Arnold, Rafael Mangual, and Daniel Di Martino discuss voters’ increasing dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party and potential 2028 frontrunners, why President Trump is targeting the Smithsonian’s museums, and reporting that an Eric Adams adviser gave cash to a journalist in a potato chip bag.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to the City Journal podcast.

0:11.0

I'm your host, Charles Fane Lehman, Senior Editor of City Journal.

0:14.6

Joining me on the panel today are New to Arnold, Rapha Mengual, and Daniel DiMortino.

0:19.6

You know them, you love them, you know they're from the Manhattan Institute, and also frequently city journal.

0:25.4

Let's jump right into the news of the day.

0:28.2

Nizu actually sent me this piece, so she has to have takes on it.

0:32.1

There's a recent analysis from the New York Times, which finds that the Democratic Party is

0:35.8

hemorrhaging voters long before they even go to the polls in the words of the subhead of the 30 states that track voter

0:42.5

registration by political party. Democrats lost ground to Republicans in every single one between

0:46.8

the 2020 and 2024 elections, often by a lot. They also have registration disadvantaged for

0:53.0

the first time in at least five years

0:54.7

abuse data.

0:55.8

And so there's a bunch of big red flashing warning signs for the Democrats in terms of

1:00.3

registration.

1:01.6

A lot of people say registration doesn't matter.

1:03.4

And I think there is an interesting question to hear about, is this about a decline

1:06.6

in partisan identification versus a decline in willingness to vote?

1:10.1

But it is part of this broader

1:11.6

changing electorate that we talk about a lot on the show and that we're very interested in

1:16.2

that transformation. So I want to throw it to the panel. What do we make of this headline?

1:21.4

What do we make of this development? Is this a warning sign? Is it a sign of something else?

1:26.0

What should what what what should

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 16 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Manhattan Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Manhattan Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.