From WNYC in New York, this is On the media.

I'm Bob Garfield.

And I'm Brooke Gladstone.

Super Tuesday was so last week.

And like all the other traditional benchmarks of 2012's presidential season, Super Tuesday,

like Iowa, like New Hampshire, was meh. Call it meh Tuesday, partly because fewer than half

the states participated, as did in 2008, but mostly because despite the breathless expostulations of pundits, it resolved nothing.

And so if you look at that and you say, okay, what's Romney's problem?

Well, he's not connecting. He's not even connecting to the people he should be connected.

Now, this is a guess clearly labeled, but if Republicans get to their convention with no nominee, I predict they'll

pick someone other than those in the current field.

That is the battleground state of Ohio.

He will be able to secure his claim to the nomination only if he beats Rick Santorum in

that big state.

That last prediction was simply wrong.

The previous one was meaningless, and the first one sounded like

a little cry of pain modified to fit your screen. Typically, political pundits are able to get

away with making predictions that are spectacularly wrong because there's no real downside to it.

Make an extraordinary claim, and you'll get a ton of attention. If a few years later

it turns out you were wrong, well, it's not as if somebody's going to go back and check your work,

that is, until now. Sanjay Air is one of the minds behind Pundit Tracker, a new site that will keep

track of the predictions that pundits make and score whether or not they actually turn out to be, you know, true.

...