meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Psychology In Seattle Podcast

Toxic Masculinity and Invisible Loyalties

Psychology In Seattle Podcast

Kirk Honda

Mental Health, Health & Fitness

4.61.2K Ratings

🗓️ 28 January 2022

⏱️ 70 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Dr. Kirk and Humberto answer emails.

Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattle
Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contact
Get merch: https://teespring.com/stores/psychology-in-seattle
Dr. Kirk’s Cameo: https://www.cameo.com/kirkhonda
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/
Discord: https://discord.gg/6QR4sE8x9K
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/PsychologyInSeattle/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PsychInSeattle
Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/
Facebook Fan Page (run by fans): https://www.facebook.com/groups/112633189213033

The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®

Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.

Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com

This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/3269717/advertisement

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

So, Berto, I thought we would read some patron emails and answer them, what do you say?

0:05.2

Let's do it. This is the Psychology and Seattle podcast. I'm a host, Dr. Kirk Honda,

0:09.5

I'm a therapist, and I'm also a professor who are you Umberto. My name is Umberto Casinha,

0:14.7

and I am a pervert of used gum. Patron Simone from New York says,

0:19.2

Hi, Dr. Kirk and Umberto, I found myself particularly enjoying the part of your toxic masculinity

0:24.8

episode where you and Umberto were listing examples of characters who displayed toxic masculinity

0:31.0

traits and those who also displayed positive masculinity traits. I was curious to know if you

0:39.0

both had any examples of characters who showed both. One of my favorite characters is the character,

0:45.0

one of my favorites along these lines is the character Steve from Stranger Things. At first,

0:50.4

he is toxic masculine in that he puts on a persona of being stereotypical

0:56.3

as a cool kid in a high school in the 80s, a show off at athlete, a bully, and one who dismisses

1:02.3

his girlfriend's needs and concerns. But eventually, he comes to realize that doing so wasn't worth

1:07.4

the damage he was causing. Over the course of the show, he then picks up a lot of great qualities,

1:12.5

like putting himself in harm's way to save others, prioritizing his girlfriend's happiness,

1:17.4

even if that meant letting her go, and even taking on the role, like watching over other kids,

1:23.5

that would not be considered masculine. I would a toxic masculine. I would love to hear any other

1:28.8

examples you can think of along these lines. So, Umberto, I didn't give you a chance to prep for this,

1:34.5

so I'm kind of spring this on you, but I took a couple of minutes to think about some. But before

1:39.2

doing that, I just want to review the toxic versus positive masculine characters that we identified.

1:44.6

I don't know if you can remember my top of your head, but for me, the toxic masculine characters

1:49.4

that I listed, um, in order from, uh, like the most to like one through five. Number one was the

1:58.0

funds. I thought he was, especially in the first couple of seasons, like just quintessential toxic

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Kirk Honda, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Kirk Honda and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.