meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

To the Bench and Back Again

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Heritage Foundation

Government

4.5527 Ratings

🗓️ 22 November 2020

⏱️ 55 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

It was a quiet week for the Court, so your hosts take the time to highlight some of the most interesting cases that are waiting for the Court to take them up. Amy also discusses the one case that was picked, and GianCarlo interviews Professor Paul Cassell, a former federal judge and leading expert in the field of victims' rights. Lastly, GianCarlo tests Amy's architectural knowledge with trivia related to the Supreme Court building.


Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.


Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!


Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the court.

0:05.4

I'm Amy Swearer.

0:06.9

And I'm John Carlo Conoparo.

0:08.5

And welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court, what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government.

0:20.6

Welcome to another episode of SCOTUS 101.

0:23.6

Welcome back.

0:25.6

This week we have grants, but we do not have oral arguments.

0:29.6

The justices are on an oral argument break until after Thanksgiving, and we'll be back on

0:34.6

Monday, November 30th for those oral arguments.

0:42.5

They will still be holding Friday conferences, so keep an eye out for Monday orders and grants.

0:48.0

Or if you don't have time for that, just always join us back here at SCOTUS 101, where John Carler and I have kept an eye on it for you.

0:51.3

On Monday, the court announced that it will hear a case called Cedar Point Nursery

0:55.2

versus Haseed involving the question of whether the uncompensated appropriation of an easement

1:00.7

that is limited in time amounts to a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment. That was a

1:07.2

mouthful. No kidding. Amy, unpack that for me. Okay, so let's start at the beginning.

1:12.8

Cedar Point Nursery is a strawberry nursery, not a child care center.

1:17.8

They're suing California over a state regulation that says agricultural growers must allow union organizers to access their property up to three hours per day, 120 days each year.

1:30.1

And they have to do it for free. So neither the union organizers nor the government is required

1:36.1

to have to pay for this access. Cedar Point Nursery is alleging that union organizers routinely

1:43.2

use this law to come onto their property

1:45.2

during work hours with bullhorns to recruit employees and conduct basically disruptive protests.

1:52.1

They're arguing that as property owners, they have a right to exclude unwanted persons from

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.