meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

A Drink at the Judgment Bar

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Heritage Foundation

Government

4.5527 Ratings

🗓️ 13 November 2020

⏱️ 46 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this week's episode, your hosts are back in the studio to cover new cases, emergency election orders, and some of the term's biggest oral arguments. GianCarlo discusses the arguments in Brownback, and Amy walks us through the oral arguments in Texas v. California the most recent challenge to the Affordable Care Act. GianCarlo also interviews Professor John Yoo about his latest book: Defender in Chief: Donald Trump's Fight for Presidential Power. Lastly, Amy tries to stump GianCarlo with Veterans Day trivia, but he turns the table on her with some trivia of his own!


You can find Professor Yoo's book here.


Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @ scotus101 and send comments, questions, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.


Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!


Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug:

https://shop.heritage.org/products/scotus-101-mug.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the court.

0:05.4

I'm Amy Swearer.

0:06.9

And I'm Johncarlo Conoparo.

0:08.5

And welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down, what's happening at the Supreme Court, what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government.

0:20.2

Welcome to another episode of SCOTUS 101.

0:23.7

Yes, welcome.

0:25.3

We have quite the show for you today.

0:27.8

We've got grants.

0:29.4

We've got emergency orders.

0:31.3

We've got oral arguments.

0:33.9

But most importantly, we've got our studio back.

0:41.2

Yes, that's right, folks.

0:42.8

We are back in our studio.

0:45.6

That makes us official podcasters, I think.

0:48.3

Yeah, I think so too.

0:49.7

Like the more official podcasters instead of feeling like we're doing it from our mother's basement or something.

0:55.6

Well, first up this week in orders, we had a grant of a case in Carr v. Saul.

1:01.9

This is consolidated with another case, and it's an appointments clause challenge to social

1:07.1

security administration judges.

1:09.5

And these cases ask the question whether a Social Security claimant forfeits an

1:13.3

Appointments Clause challenge to Social Security Administration judges if he fails to make

1:18.4

the challenge during the administrative proceedings.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.