Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, I say a few things very often.

When someone says, let me be clear, what they're about to say more often than not

would be absolute poo-poo.

Another one is when anyone starts a sentence with, as a fill in the blank, they are appealing

to their own experience to make their opinions more worthwhile and generally speaking, their opinions suck. Behold.

As somebody that-

For that, he got a bullet.

As somebody that runs the counter-organization to Charlie Kirk's turning point, that is not the point of what Charlie Kirk was doing.

Charlie Kirk did not decide to debate high-profile debaters, people like Destiny or people on the left that would actually give him a real debate. In fact, he even denied debating Dean Withers. I was literally with him when he did that, okay? So it's not like he was going in to have a real debate. He would go to these college campuses to debate. No, he would go to these college campuses to debate kids that were very much under prepared so that he could

clip them and then raise money for turning point to go out there and then register voters.

And I think that that's brilliant.

Okay, that's why I'm trying to replicate it.

But you cannot say that he was there for free speech because that's not really free speech,

especially when Charlie Kirk went and tried to deny, he denied us from going

into his events just because we were Democrats. He canceled our permits, even though we had permits

that we paid for. That's not free speech. You wouldn't argue that he would regularly, and I mean,

almost on a daily basis, debate with people that we didn't agree with. College students, unprepared college students?

Let me throw it back.

Let me throw it.

In comparison to the highly skilled debater, destiny, the poor little college students.

There's so much I have to say about this. I'm going to let it roll for another minute and 10 seconds.

Back to you something, I'm interested in about your response to this.

...