Thu. 10/13 - Warhol & Prince & Galileo & Elvis.
Cool Stuff Daily
Reggie Risseeuw and Marques Pfaff
4.6 • 739 Ratings
🗓️ 13 October 2022
⏱️ 18 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Ready to launch your business? Get started with the commerce platform made for entrepreneurs. |
| 0:04.8 | Shopify is specially designed to help you start, run and grow your business with easy customizable themes that let you build your brand. |
| 0:12.5 | Marketing tools that get your products out there. Integrated shipping solutions that actually save you time. |
| 0:17.5 | From startups to scaleups, online, in person and on the go shopify is made for |
| 0:22.9 | entrepreneurs like you sign up for your one dollar a month trial at shopify dot com slash setup |
| 0:28.7 | it's thursday october 13th, 2022. I'm Jackson Bird today. A Supreme Court case involving Prince and Andy Warhol that could have huge implications on the future of art. Plus, a new book by Galileo just dropped, and a song sung by 100,000 people who didn't know they were singing together. |
| 1:00.0 | Here's some cool stuff for your ride home. |
| 1:05.0 | There's been a lot of hubbub recently around the rights of artists in AI art generation. Like, how should an artist whose work |
| 1:14.4 | is being culled by the AI be credited? Is there any sort of compensation they should get if |
| 1:20.3 | the AI generated art that partially uses some of this other artist's art is commercialized? |
| 1:26.5 | And how did these artists even find out their art is being |
| 1:29.2 | used? It's a hot topic right now, and frankly makes my head spin a bit. But while the Web3 folks |
| 1:36.9 | tread that inevitably litigious path, there's a more traditional case that's made it all the |
| 1:42.6 | way to the Supreme Court, even though the two most |
| 1:46.0 | famous artists involved have long since passed away. The case centers on a series of 16 |
| 1:52.9 | silk screens that Andy Warhol produced of the musician Prince. They're not Warhol's most |
| 1:58.8 | famous works, but you might recognize them. Or if you saw them |
| 2:02.0 | altogether, you'd probably guess that they were made by Warhol. But the reference image used for |
| 2:07.2 | the silk screens was not taken by Warhol. It was taken by a photographer named Lynn Goldsmith, |
| 2:14.3 | and she never gave her permission for Warhol to use them. |
| 2:18.5 | And how this case gets decided could have far-reaching implications for artists and free |
| 2:24.3 | expression in the U.S. So here's roughly what happened, as NPR describes it. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Reggie Risseeuw and Marques Pfaff, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Reggie Risseeuw and Marques Pfaff and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

