Good evening. We're listening to Three Moves Ahead, and I'm your host, Job, Zachny.

Tonight, I am joined by Three Moves Head founder, Troy Goodfellow.

Good evening.

And our friend Katakus, Luke Blunkett.

Hey, guys. Thanks for having me back.

Oh, thanks for coming back.

So tonight we're revisiting Unity of Command 2 in part because that game just had its

Barbarossa expansion.

This follows on the heels of its War in the West expansion,

where it covered their,

I think it was actually Blitzkrieg and then War in the West,

but basically their campaigns covering the invasion of Poland

and the invasion of France.

So now they come back to Barbarossa, which is, of course, ground the Unity of Command

series has already covered with Unity of Command 1. And I was really interested in seeing how

Barbarossa felt in this new system, because it is a very different game than Unity of Command

1. And I thought this would be an interesting moment to sort of compare side by side what these two

games really are about and how when you sort of model the same campaign in both systems, it takes on, in my opinion, a completely

different cast. And just to let you know, it turns out I'm a much worse general in Unity

of Command, too. Barbarossa is impossible. I don't know how anything good happened for the Germans in that campaign,

because it certainly didn't break that way for me. How did you all find it? I mean, Unity

of Commandant 2 is a harder game, and then Unity of Command 1. It's got a lot more going on. I think

...