Welcome to Manor Tools.

The Tyranny of Unpublished Processes. Part 2, here we go.

This podcast answers these questions.

Should processes be published or shared? Why should processes be

published and what's a good way to publish them?

By registering for a free account on the manager tools website, you'll be officially joining the fold.

We know you're out there. We have 2 million listens of our podcasts every month.

Don't make this the only time we get to talk. If you want to hear more

from us, more on how we can help you become a more effective manager and more productive

professional. Sign up now. more communication is better.

We believe that manager tools you become more valuable when you document and publish your shared processes.

To publish your process your part of a process is

of a process is to be collaborative to invite others to offer suggestions

to publish is to capture for future participants because we believe we will be

creating more value in a different role with increased responsibilities in the future.

To capture what you know and to publish it is to allow immediate communication

versus, say, episodic transfers. And that's, look's look guys that's only the beginning. If you do

work that others add to or support or have to communicate about or measure or report on the professional approach is to publish the process.

Absolutely. Part of the problem with undocumented and therefore of course unpublished processes

Really we've seen this before right we saw it during the reengineering boom of the 90s and while some people may remember that as a time of

layoffs or even a politically palatable cover for layoffs BPR had in arguable routes in both efficiency and effectiveness.

Companies of course were caught trying to re-engineer processes that weren't published and hours and the time and the energy it took to

...