The Twitter Files Explained w/ Kmele Foster
The Dispatch Podcast
The Dispatch
4.6 • 3.3K Ratings
🗓️ 25 January 2023
⏱️ 75 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome to the Dispatch Podcast on David French on my last full day of Dispatch podcasting |
| 0:22.5 | and Dispatch work before I move over to the New York Times. So for my last full day of podcasting, |
| 0:31.2 | now the advisory opinions podcast is still going to continue. But for my last full day of |
| 0:36.0 | podcasting, I couldn't think of a better person to talk to than my friend Camille Foster Camille. |
| 0:43.3 | Where do I begin with you? One of the leading voices of reason on Twitter? Is that a good |
| 0:50.2 | is that a good by-line? Co-hosts. We co-hosts a We The Fifth podcast, which I've had the honor of |
| 0:57.2 | being on a couple of times. And just general all around just general all around friend of liberty. |
| 1:07.6 | And so I like that. Camille and I have been in a kind of online foxhole together before and we'll |
| 1:15.9 | get into that. But the main reason I brought Camille here is we're going to talk about the Twitter |
| 1:21.0 | files and a bit about the Facebook files, which is a much sort of smaller category of the conversation, |
| 1:29.7 | not in consequence, but in kind of the conversation. So we want to talk about free speech online. |
| 1:37.3 | And I want to get Camille's take on what he thinks about the Twitter files. I've been very curious |
| 1:42.4 | about his sort of holistic take on this. As I said, he's always been to me one of the more |
| 1:53.6 | reasonable and proportionate voices on Twitter. You recognize when small things are small things |
| 2:01.5 | and when big things are big things and that's a gift. So we're going to drill down into all of that. |
| 2:08.9 | But before before we do, I want to talk a bit about our shared experience in the online foxhole. |
| 2:15.2 | Camille and I along with Thomas Chatterton Williams and Jason Stanley wrote a op-ed in the New York Times |
| 2:22.5 | cautioning against these anti-CRT bills that had been proposed and passed in many state legislatures. |
| 2:30.3 | On a couple of grounds, one was just as a general matter, it is not a good practice to oppose ideas |
| 2:39.5 | by banning ideas. And that was sort of the general thesis statement. And then a secondary look at |
| 2:46.2 | sort of the precise details of many of these bills. They were poorly written |
| 2:51.2 | overbroad, very vague, left people with very little guidance as to how to regulate their speech. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

