The Truth About Terrence Howard's Patents: Part 2

Into the Impossible With Brian Keating

Brian Keating

Science, Physics, Natural Sciences

4.7 • 1.1K Ratings

🗓️ 15 August 2024

⏱️ 54 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Getting it right is the hallmark of any great scientist. And when we don’t, we should be able to say we were wrong. In part 2 of debunking all the claims Terrence Howard made on the Joe Rogan Experience, I start by first apologizing for misrepresenting the number of patents Howard has. Even though he doesn’t have the 97 patents he claimed to have, he does hold quite a few, contrary to my earlier assertions. But this episode is not all sunshine and rainbows. I actually go through 17 different newfound complaints about that conversation. This video will go through each one of those points, and we'll even take a deep dive into one of Eric Weinstein's favorite hobby horses, peer review. Tune in! — Key Takeaways: 00:00 Intro 00:46 Apology for errors about Howard's patents 01:48 Overview of Howard's actual patent portfolio 06:48 Importance of precise scientific communication 14:37 Is there north and south in space? 15:28 Penrose stairs, scientific collaboration, quantum entanglement 19:36 The role of patents in science 22:44 The relationship between photons and electrons 25:45 Critique of Howard's scientific claims 31:04 Defense of peer review in science 43:32 Potential innovations in scientific publishing — Additional resources: ➡️ Part 1: https://youtu.be/Et5Ripimfs8 ➡️ Find the full list of Terrence Howard’s patents here: https://briankeating.com/th/ ➡️ Follow me on your fav platforms: ✖️ Twitter: https://twitter.com/DrBrianKeating 🔔 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1 📝 Join my mailing list: https://briankeating.com/list ✍️ Check out my blog: https://briankeating.com/cosmic-musings/ 🎙️ Follow my podcast: https://briankeating.com/podcast — Into the Impossible with Brian Keating is a podcast dedicated to all those who want to explore the universe within and beyond the known. Make sure to follow/subscribe so you never miss an episode! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	I was wrong about Terrence Howard and this video is my apology to that great actor.
0:04.9	Based on a conversation he and I have had since his appearance alongside Eric Weinstein on the Joe Roggan experience.
0:10.4	But this video is not all sunshine and rainbows. I actually go through 17 different
0:15.1	new found complaints about that otherwise monumental four-hour conversation.
0:20.8	This video will go through each one of those points and will even take a deep dot and one of Eric Weinstein's favorite hobby horses, which is peer review.
0:29.0	You won't want to miss it. That's coming up at the end. Let's go. technology is indistinguishable from magic.
0:44.0	Open the pod bay doors.
0:47.0	Before we get to the groveling and please for forgiveness, I want to make sure that you've either seen the entire conversation with Eric Joe and Terence or you watch my part one analysis of it.
0:57.0	Part one took issue with four different aspects of Terence's claims, including the fact that 1 times 1 equals 2, that gravity needs to be destroyed,
1:07.3	that the Pirrock table is not what we think it is, and most importantly that he has 97 patents
1:11.7	to his name, and that's where my error lies. After my part one
1:15.2	video which you can find up here Terence reached out through Eric to correct my
1:18.8	errors. He actually showed me that I had made many mistakes about his patent repertoire.
1:24.6	And I want to analyze those as well, because I think getting it right is the most important
1:28.2	hallmark of a scientist.
1:29.8	And the scientist should be able to say when he or she is wrong.
1:32.2	And that includes amateurs like
1:33.5	Terence. But it also applies to the dangerous rise in anti-science sentiment that's being
1:39.9	promulgated by figures in the culture like Candice Owens, Tucker Carlson, and many more.
1:45.8	We won't talk about those characters today.
1:48.4	Let's start with the apology.
1:49.9	In my last video, I said, in Terence's case case he applied for it in 2010 and has a number you can find it on Google of the patent application
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Brian Keating, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Brian Keating and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.