So we have three experts on constitutional law,

three experts on the Supreme Court,

three experts on the attacks we are facing

as the court is doing its business this term.

And I wanna kick this off, Damon,

with a question to you.

We just witnessed the Supreme Court issue its decision in the Kaleigh case,

Louisiana versus Kaleigh. This is, in my estimation, the worst voting case in recent memory,

I mean in modern time, you know, you can go back. I think it's worse than Shelby County. It doesn't

even to be getting the attention of Shelby County, but I think it's worse in Shelby County.

And so, you know, as someone who leads the premier lawyers, civil rights organization and legal organization, give me your perspective on what the court did and as importantly, like where you think

we are going from here. Great to be with you, wish it was better circumstances. Mark, you're right.

This is the worst voting rights case, certainly of the modern era. You have covered in democracy

docket in your audience knows a lot of the details, but

short stories that the court has gutted the rest of Section 2, the right, there was a prior

gutting, of course, the case that you had Bernovich v. DNC, also a majority opinion by

Justice Alito. That was a sleeping, I won't say John is sleeping something

at the time, but now its impact is more profound where he talked about the usual burdens of voting.

Now those burdens are very great and grave in terms of time, place, manner restrictions that we

struggle to address through litigation. So in this case, the court

has got it the rest of Section 2 moving from vote denial challenges to vote dilution. And it's

essentially told us, it's essentially ratcheted up the standard. You can think of the section 2

...