The political reason not to do it is I can get away with it now.

But if I live in a society where this is allowed with the other guys' rights are not protected,

some guy is going to do it to me.

There's always somebody smarter than you.

There's always somebody more conniving and more than you are, right?

And they're the one who are going to go after, they'll come after you.

So you're far better off living in a society where everybody's rights are protected,

including your own, the living

in society in which rights are not protected, and therefore you can be easily the victim of the

next guy who comes after you. But, you know, the real issue, you know, only in movies, the bad

guys live good lives. Right. That's beautifully said. Something that really resonated with me from

Jordan Peterson's. He said in his 25 years, I think of clinical psychology, he said he never

saw anyone get away with anything. And that was so powerful.

And maybe I would like to ask you this,

he described it as this twisting of the moral fabric of reality

that inevitably snaps back to hurts you.

Is this something Rand would agree with it,

that the moral fabric of existence is something objectively true?

So there's no say she would reject the idea of a moral fabric.

But she would say morality is objectively true.

And when you go against morality, right?

Now, I would define morality very differently than Jordan Peterson.

...