meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Pod is Submitted

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Heritage Foundation

Government

4.5527 Ratings

🗓️ 24 April 2020

⏱️ 42 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Elizabeth Slattery & Tiffany Bates have a big announcement that you won't want to miss! They also recap the Court's latest rulings (non-unanimous jury verdicts, point source pollutants, and more), and Elizabeth chatted with 2nd Circuit Judge Michael Park about his affinity for NSYNC and Microsoft Outlook. Stay tuned for Supreme Trivia - Dramatic Departures edition.


Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send comments, questions, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org. Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!


Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug: https://shop.heritage.org/products/scotus-101-mug.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I'm Elizabeth Lattery. And I'm Tiffany Bates. And welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court, what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government.

0:15.3

This week, we're talking about the court's recent opinions, and Elizabeth chatted with Second Circuit Judge Mike Park.

0:21.7

So before we get into the latest opinions, I wanted to mention that this is our last

0:27.2

episode together. As you all know, Tiffany left the Heritage Foundation a couple of years ago

0:32.1

and is now at a firm in D.C. I will also be leaving Heritage to head to the Pacific Legal Foundation.

0:38.7

So I want to thank you all of our wonderful listeners for tuning in to hear what we have to say

0:42.8

for all the emails and tweets over the years and especially for those who bought SCOTUS 101

0:47.9

mugs. They're still available on shop.Heritage.org. So please go get one if you don't have one.

0:54.0

And if you'd like to hear

0:55.1

what we're up to in the future, I'd encourage you to follow both of us on Twitter. I'm at

0:59.1

E.H. Slattery and Tiffany is at Tiffany H. Bates. Yeah, we've really enjoyed starting and growing

1:06.5

this podcast together over the last few years, and we're so appreciative to all of our listeners

1:11.2

and supporters and fellow SCOTUS nerds, of course. So thank you, and we're both really going to miss

1:17.8

you. But fear not, the show must go on. So in the coming weeks, I will be introducing you to the new hosts

1:23.8

of SCOTUS 101. So with that brief note, now we'll get into what's going on at the court.

1:29.9

So the court has moved many of the March and April arguments to its next term.

1:34.9

It will hear argument by telephone in early May in a handful of cases.

1:39.5

And those include the case involving the House committee's attempt to subpoena President

1:43.8

Trump's tax returns,

1:45.5

the long-suffering Little Sisters of the Poor, and McGirt v. Oklahoma, in which a criminal

1:51.6

defendant is challenging his conviction on the grounds that half of Oklahoma is actually

1:56.4

Indian country. So it'll be really interesting to see how these telearguments go. I know courts

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.