This episode is brought to you by my friend Rebecca Walcer, a financial expert who can help you protect your wealth book your free call with her team by going to friend of denes.com

That's friend of denes.com

Coming up, I'll expose how a Pfizer board member played an active role in Twitter censorship of the COVID debate and specifically the efficacy of the vaccine.

While the left blames the Brazil uprising on insufficient social media censorship, I'll argue that censorship is the problem not the solution.

Newsmax host Grekkelli joins me. We're going to talk about his new book Justice for All. This is the Dineshtus who's a show.

America needs this voice. The times are crazy and the time of confusion, division and lies. We need a brave voice of reason, understanding and truth. This is the Dineshtus Sousa podcast.

The latest drop of the Twitter files comes from the journalist Alex Berenzen. I've had Alex on the show some months ago now. And Alex has been focused on science reporting and of late specifically on reporting about COVID.

What's kind of interesting about these Twitter files is that the Twitter files involve Alex himself. So it's particularly appropriate that he be the one to blow the whistle on it. And I think Elon Musk is being very clever, very strategic, Matt Taibe, Barry Weiss.

And now Alex, Alex Berenzen, there have been a couple of others as well. Now this story begins with a guy named Scott Gottlieb. Scott Gottlieb is a director of Pfizer, Pfizer, the medical company.

And he's kind of a big name on Twitter. He has about 550,000 Twitter followers. In any event, it turns out that he sees a tweet. Gottlieb does. And he goes, whoa, this is a tweet that may not be good for Pfizer. This is a tweet that might hurt Pfizer, mRNA vaccine sales.

And the tweet was from, you know, it wasn't from some activists who wasn't from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. wasn't even from Berenzen. It was from Dr. Brett Jeroire, a physician who also had been himself as Gottlieb was head of the Food and Drug Administration.

And the tweet was not an anti-vaccine tweet. In fact, it ended by saying get vaccinated. But the tweet went on to say, hey, listen, it says that the, the, the, the immunity that you get from the vaccine may not be as great as natural immunity. In fact, natural immunity provides more protection than vaccine immunity.

Now, this is, in fact, a, an accurate statement by Dr. Jeroire. And in fact, the doctor cited a prominent study, a peer reviewed study that showed this. So it wasn't just that he was claiming it. It was that he was documenting it. And, and it's not even that Scott Gottlieb disagreed with him. Scott, Scott Gottlieb agreed that the factual statement being made was true.

And yet, Gottlieb, by the way, as I mentioned former FDA commissioner is even today a prominent contributor and places like MSNBC, CNBC.

And, and as I mentioned, a senior board member of Pfizer, in fact, not just an ordinary board member. He sits sort of on their central committee that reviews vaccines and other such topics in an event.

What, what Gottlieb does is he recognizes that Pfizer, which by the way had about 81 billion dollars of sales in 2021, out of which half of that money came from one source, you guessed it, the vaccine.

So this is big money for Pfizer. And by the way, Gottlieb receives himself big money for Pfizer. So what does he do? He writes, he emails Todd O'Boyle, a top lobbyist in the Twitter Washington office. And he says the post is quote, corrosive notice, not inaccurate, but corrosive. Why? Because he says quote, if it ends up going viral, he worries that it will quote end up going viral and driving news coverage.

So Twitter takes a look at it. And they basically say, hey, listen, there's, it doesn't violate our rules. In fact, the tweet appears to be accurate. And yet Twitter ends up flagging the tweet, putting warning tags on it, which are themselves misleading.

The kind of a mislead this tweet is misleading tag and prevents people from seeing the tweet. And it's tagged even now, even though there have been multiple studies that have come out since the tweet, confirming the accuracy of the tweet. Now, about a week later, Gottlieb strikes again.

And he goes back to Twitter and he complains about a tweet from a guy named Justin Hart. Now, Justin Hart is one of these guys who's kind of a, we call him a COVID vaccine skeptic, but he has 100,000 followers on Twitter.

And basically what Hart says is that you don't need these vaccines to be administered to children. The mortality rate for children and dying from COVID is extremely low.

What do you do? Accurate statement to whether children need or don't need vaccines is a point of view. But there's a reasonable basis for thinking that children need these vaccines much less than anyone else. And yet, this is the key and yet Gottlieb knows that that that Pfizer is pushing vaccines on children.

...