Bill, people know from listening to you that you have a real heart in this issue, the

issue of the unborn, the issue of abortion, and you comment from time to time, this is

a New York Times article from earlier this month, and it throws a bucket of cold water

on the celebrations surrounding the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

In other words, it's not time for pro-life people to relax.

The future of abortion, both the practice itself and the legal fight over it, will increasingly

revolve around prescription drugs that women can take at home or their doctor's office

to end their pregnancies.

The Food and Drug Administration approved Mifrapris Stone in the year 2000.

It has been used to terminate more than 5 million pregnancies, and it's going to be

difficult to regulate and legislate as we'll see in this piece.

Apparently, the future of abortion will not be in clinics, but in the drug store.

Yeah, I think that pro-life people were well aware that this was coming, Kevin, when Mifrapris

Stone was approved so many years ago, because now the so-called morning after pill can be

taken after sexual intercourse, and you can cause a miscarriage without any difficulty of

going to a clinic and having a surgical abortion.

And before we get into the weeds talking about this, I just want to emphasize to our listeners,

once again, that the ethical issue raised by abortion is the intrinsic moral value of

human life.

There are two questions here that need to be answered.

Is the developing fetus, a human being, and do human beings have intrinsic moral value?

And it seems to me that the answer to both of those questions is fairly clearly yes.

...