Whatever Edmonton has in their playbook, it's better than what the stars have right now.

You know, as we talk about teams in the postseason, they all get different treatment around here, don't they?

If the Cowboys lose a game like that last night, we have people lined up ready to just say, you know, they're but a bunch of chokers.

This is three years in a row now.

And again, the season's not over yet.

They're just down 3-1, but they have a 9% chance of winning, I guess, the last three games.

That's right.

And as a franchise, they've never come back from 3-1.

That doesn't sound very good. But I thought what Tim Kalashaw wrote in the Dallas Morning News this morning is tough to hear.

I don't necessarily agree with all of it that the stars were not tough enough and not smart enough to win this thing.

My take is they just don't have the shooters that Edmonton does.

They are stronger with the puck.

They had more opportunities.

They've had more opportunities in the last two games.

But now in the last three games, you add up 3-0, 6-1 and 4-1.

Granted, there's some empty netters in there.

But that's 13-2 in the last three games.

I feared Edmonton coming into this thing because of McDavid and Drysidal.

That's no, you know, breaking news.

We all did. But's no, you know, breaking news. We all did.

But, man, they have better shooters, and that's why they are up 3-1.

Yeah, and you need your big guns to do something, right?

...