meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Bribe, Swindle or Steal

The Massive, Multi-Country Airbus Settlement

Bribe, Swindle or Steal

Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International

News, Business, Business News

4.9582 Ratings

🗓️ 19 February 2020

⏱️ 24 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Aisling O'Shea of Sullivan & Cromwell describes the Airbus settlement that resulted in penalties totaling almost $4 billion and involved resolutions with U.S., UK and French authorities.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to the podcast, bribes,windle, or steal. I'm Alexandra Ragi. Today I'm speaking

0:11.5

with Ashling O'Shea. Ashling is co-head of Sullivan and Cromwell's FCPA and Anti-Corruption Group and a member of the

0:17.1

firm's litigation group. Her practice focuses primarily on criminal defense,

0:21.6

government investigations, and the FCPA. Prior to joining Sullivan and Cromwell,

0:26.2

Ashling spent five years at the Department of Justice as a trial attorney in the criminal

0:30.5

division's fraud section. For our purposes today, we're going to tap into Ashling's

0:35.1

FCPA expertise to walk through the recent Airbus settlement.

0:39.4

Ashling, thank you for joining me.

0:41.4

Thanks so much for having me.

0:43.2

Airbus, a deferred prosecution agreement, almost $4 billion.

0:47.5

Why don't you take us through this?

0:49.5

This was a fairly blockbuster settlement that came out at the end of the last month. It is the largest ever

0:56.4

global foreign bribery resolution as parties to the resolution were the United States,

1:02.2

France, and the United Kingdom. And what we've seen here in the Airbus resolution is really

1:08.7

an unprecedented level of international cooperation, which I think

1:12.4

is going to end up being the long-term takeaway of the resolution. Why don't we go right back to the

1:17.5

beginning? When was the misconduct? And how did it come to light? The misconduct, and I'm going to focus now

1:23.8

on the misconduct as reflected in the DPA with the United States because there are

1:29.4

slightly different time periods in the agreements. And I think the U.S. and the French ones

1:34.9

cover the longest time period. The U.S. DPA covers the period of 2008 to 2015 and involves,

1:43.5

as the statement of facts characterized it, a massive scheme to pay bribes

1:48.4

to decision makers and other influencers, including foreign officials in multiple countries

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Alexandra Addison-Wrage of TRACE International and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.