He finds enablers in the judiciary everywhere.

One of the few positive things Donald has done is shine a very bright light on the extent to which all of our systems are broken and the ways in which

they're weak.

Hi and welcome back to Amicus.

This is Slate's podcast about the courts and the law, the Supreme Court, and suddenly the law

of special masters.

I'm Dahlia Lithwick. I cover the law for Slate.

And even though on this show, we've spent the summer gorging on great books,

we are not blind to the fact that the former president to the United States kept classified documents at his golf club,

refused to return them, lied about it, and may or may not

have exposed, like, you know, sources and methods as well as nuclear secrets of allies or

enemies, as one does in the summer. This show returns thus to an old favorite theme,

The Law of Trump, or does such a thing even exist?

Later on in the show, Slate Plus subscribers will delight to the dulcet tones of our own Mark

Joseph Stern as he and I review some of the week's lawlessness at Mar-a-Lago, a judicial order

from Texas that seemingly implicates HIV drugs, but actually

tries to crater the ACA again. And we probe whether reckless judging is in fact contagious.

That conversation with Mark can only be accessed by Slate Plus members. If you'd like to join us

and have access to bonus segments from lots

of your favorite Slate shows, completely add free episodes, and if never hitting a paywall for any

of Slate's articles, sounds good to you too. Do go to slate.com slash amicus plus to sign up. That's slate.com

slash amicus plus. And thank you, by the way, for

...