4.6 • 949 Ratings
🗓️ 24 July 2025
⏱️ 36 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Adam Michel, Michael Cannon, and Dominik Lett break down the One Big Beautiful Bill. Is it $3.4 trillion, or actually $6 trillion? Is Medicaid getting a cut or a trim? With spending cuts pushed to later years and tax benefits front-loaded, the scholars dissect the political calculations and baseline accounting that shaped this massive piece of legislation.
Show Notes:
Michael F. Cannon, Krit Chanwong, and Dominik Lett, "Congress Must Cut and Reform Medicaid" cato.org, April 28, 2025
Domink Lett, "The Senate’s Big Beautiful Blunder Could Increase the Debt by $6 Trillion" cato.org, July 2, 2025
Adam Michel, "A Fiscal Hawk’s Defense of the GOP’s Deficit-Busting Budget Bill" cato.org, July 10, 2025
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Welcome, everyone. I am Adam Michelle, Director of Tax Policy Studies here at the Cato Institute. I'm here with two of my colleagues to discuss the One Big Beautiful Bill. I'm here with Michael Cannon, Director of Health Policy Studies at Cato. |
0:20.1 | And Dominic Litt, budget policy analyst. |
0:22.7 | Excellent. So the one big, beautiful bill passed through Congress. President Trump signed it on July 4th. A big ceremony. The bill touches just about every facet of the federal budget, tax policy, the broader economy. It's hard to |
0:40.4 | put into a 30-minute podcast what it all covers. But I'm hoping to start with you, Dom, try to give us |
0:48.5 | a flavor of what this thing does, sort of the low lights, highlights on the expenditure side. How does it |
0:55.9 | impact the deficit? Where are we high level with this bill? So most of the deficit cost of the |
1:03.6 | bill comes from the extension of tax cuts from Trump's first administration. Those are partially |
1:10.7 | offset by spending reductions |
1:12.2 | across a bunch of different programs, primarily spending reductions for health care. But |
1:17.1 | broad thesis level, the bill could add about $6 trillion to the debt over 10 years. As written, |
1:24.1 | the bill adds $3.4 trillion to the deficit compared to current law. But that cost |
1:28.6 | rises if you consider things like interest costs, politicians extending temporary tax |
1:33.7 | giveaways, and then you factor in the sort of macroeconomic effects from the bill, such as, |
1:40.2 | you know, everything from changing investment, but also the consequence of funding mass deportations. |
1:45.4 | By my calculations, the price tag could be upwards of $6 trillion, but it depends on the |
1:51.3 | assumptions you make. |
1:52.8 | That's a big on-paper difference, 3.4 to 6 trillion. |
1:57.2 | It is. |
1:57.5 | A lot of, a lot of discrepancy there. |
2:00.4 | There is. |
2:02.6 | So I think part of that stems from, |
2:10.5 | we're in a high debt environment. The bill adds about a trillion dollars in new interest costs, |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 6 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.