Hello again everyone and welcome to one last bastion of scientific analysis and technical reporting,

if you will. And I'd be very careful again, as always on certain platforms, to only quote government

and peer reviewed and published data. So these days, once you stick ruthlessly to that rule, the censorship is not quite so bad.

But nonetheless, the data I will show you is still quite shocking and revelatory. So this short

special is on Sweden, particularly, and generally on mortality from the viral issue.

And we're going to be talking about some essentially scientific proofs of effectiveness of certain measures.

So this one's a real keeper and the links down below to download it and please do share.

So people understand better the actual data and the actual

inferences that you can draw from it. So with that, let's get into it. It's important that we

follow the scientific method. So I'll start with Professor Carl Popper. And his famous asymmetry of

proof is an absolute joy to any real problem solver or real scientist.

And simply put, if you find evidence that is against the hypothesis, like against lockdown or

mask effectiveness, it is supremely powerful and vastly outweighs even a huge number of pieces of

evidence that seem to support the hypothesis, like correlations. And it's the Black Swan principle.

If you find an instance that clearly conflicts with hypothesis, it stands supreme. And Sweden is that example, although we

have myriad more and we have a hundred published papers now and analyses that show that the

hypothesis that lockdown and masks achieved something significant is a false hypothesis. So this recent article in mainstream in the Nordics

is interesting and it triggered me to do this video and converted into English, it's

Tegnell's victory. Sweden fared as well as the rest of the Nordics during the pandemic in

terms of life expectancy. And I won't read

any more of it, but it basically says what we now know without question. So there's other mainstream

articles out on this now and the Telegraph in London and many, many others, the spectator. So we now

...