meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Ricochet Superfeed

The Federalist Society's Teleforum: Courthouse Steps Decision: EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC and Oklahoma v. EPA

The Ricochet Superfeed

Ricochet

Politics, News

4.4654 Ratings

🗓️ 26 June 2025

⏱️ 42 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On June 18, 2025, the Supreme Court released its decisions for two circuit splits arising under the Clean Air Act (CAA) provision regarding judicial venue: EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. (23-1229), and Oklahoma v. EPA (23-1067). Decided 7-2 and 8-0, respectively, the outcome of these cases hinged on the Court’s interpretation of the CAA’s […]

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Fed Sox Forums, a podcast of the Federal Society's practice groups.

0:06.2

I'm Nate Kasmarik, Vice President and Director of Practice Groups at the Federal Society.

0:10.2

For exclusive access to live recordings of FedSock Forum programs, become a Federal Society member today at fedsock.org.

0:18.3

Hello everyone and welcome to this Federal Society virtual event. My name is Edith Harold and I'm an assistant director of practice groups with the Federalist Society. Today we're excited to be hosting this Fedstock Forum, the courthouse steps decision, focusing on two related cases, EPA versus CalMETT, Shreport,port refining and Oklahoma versus EPA.

0:38.3

We're very pleased to welcome our excellent speaker, James Conday, to this discussion, who is a partner at Gordon Gray.

0:44.3

And special thanks to Garrett Crowell for moderating this event.

0:47.3

Garrett is an associate at DLA Piper.

0:50.3

If you'd like to learn more about today's moderator or speaker, their full bios can be viewed on our website, fedsock.org.

0:56.3

And near the end of the program, we'll turn to the audience for questions. So if you have a question,

1:00.2

please entered into the Q&A function at the bottom of your Zoom window, and we'll do our best answer as many as we can.

1:06.2

And finally, I'll note that, as always, all expressions of opinion today are those of our guest speakers

1:10.9

and not the Federalist Society. With that, Garrett, thanks so much for joining us today,

1:15.3

and I'll hand things over to you. Thanks, Edy, and thank you to the Federalist Society for hosting

1:20.7

this event. Hello, everyone. My name is Garrett Crowell, and I will be your moderator today.

1:25.5

With us, we have James Condé, who is a partner at the law firm Boyden Gray, where he specializes

1:32.2

in administrative law, specifically Clean Air Act issues.

1:35.9

So he's the perfect person to have with us today to discuss two recent Supreme Court

1:41.5

decisions on the interpretation of the Clean Air Act's venue provision

1:47.6

and specifically an exception to that provision.

1:50.7

So two other housekeeping notes I'll make up front.

1:54.5

We did a similar webinar that day or two after oral argument, James and I did give our initial impressions there. So that's worth

2:02.0

to listen. If you've got the time, and second, using that Q&A chat function there, enter in some

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Ricochet, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Ricochet and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.