4.4 • 7.3K Ratings
🗓️ 9 September 2018
⏱️ 13 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Over the past week or so, there have been a couple stories about scientific research studies |
| 0:04.0 | that were polled for political reasons. We had one story about rapid onset gender dysphoria |
| 0:08.3 | get taken down because of activism. Now there's another story from Kuala'th, about a study on |
| 0:13.1 | greater male variability being taken down for political reasons. And a lot of people are saying |
| 0:17.6 | that this is because of angry feminists. But I do believe the left and the right can be both |
| 0:22.2 | equally anti-science for different reasons. We're tribal. We're going to support data if it |
| 0:28.0 | benefits our opinions or our view of the world. And so you'll see people sharing picking data to |
| 0:33.0 | suggest they are in fact correct. When in reality most situations are more nuanced and I don't think |
| 0:38.8 | any individual has a wide enough view to understand everything. In doing research on these stories, |
| 0:45.2 | I found something that I believe to be rather disturbing. Maybe disturbing isn't the right word |
| 0:50.6 | because I don't want to get too political. But there are articles from vox.com that essentially |
| 0:56.5 | argue there are inherent traits to certain races that may be the case or may not be the case. |
| 1:03.2 | And that they do believe that IQ is at least partly heritable. And that may be true. Science may |
| 1:08.8 | believe this to be true. But what's shocking to me is that typically I find the left disagrees with |
| 1:13.4 | this notion that IQ could be based on race. And it seems like vox is kind of taking that position |
| 1:20.0 | but kind of at the same time not. So let's take a look at the story they did and take a look at |
| 1:24.8 | this issue of science denial among the left and the right. And I'll just give you some of my |
| 1:30.0 | thoughts on the whole situation. In this blog from a reason, it says a mathematics paper two math |
| 1:35.6 | journals were mow-mowed into suppressing. Academic discourse is increasingly under threat from activist |
| 1:41.0 | professors. According to Professor Ted Hill, Amy Wilkinson, a senior professor of mathematics at |
| 1:45.6 | the University of Chicago, launched a successful campaign to get one mathematics journal that had |
| 1:50.1 | accepted his paper with draw its acceptance. And a second journal to unpublish the paper |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Timcast Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Timcast Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.