meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

The Edition: Water woes

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News Commentary, News, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.4785 Ratings

🗓️ 11 August 2022

⏱️ 38 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this week’s episode:

Who’s to blame for the water shortages?

James Forsyth, The Spectator’s political editor and Ciaran Nelson from Anglian Water join us to discuss the UK’s deteriorating water supply. (0.29)

Also this week: Is it time for some old-fashioned Tory state-building?

Tim Stanley from the Telegraph shares his vision for a Conservative future. He’s joined by Annabel Denham, director of communications at the Institute of Economic Affairs. (11.19)

And finally: What’s behind France’s new sexual politics?

Jonathan Miller writes about a new civil war in France between the nudes and prudes. He’s joined by Louise Perry, columnist and author of The Case Against the Sexual Revolution. (23.08)

Hosted by Lara Prendergast.

Produced by Natasha Feroze.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome to the edition podcast from The Spectator, where each week we take a look at

0:13.1

what's in the magazine with the writers behind the pieces. I'm Laura Prendergast, the Spectator's

0:17.7

Executive Editor. On this week's episode, as households start to face hosepipe bans across the country,

0:23.6

who's to blame for the water shortages?

0:25.6

Plus, is it time for Tory socialism?

0:29.6

And finally, a sexual civil war is underway in France.

0:32.6

Why are the nudes fighting the prudes?

0:35.6

First up, I'm joined by James Forsyth, our political editor, and Kieran Nelson, spokesperson for Anglian Water.

0:44.0

James, in the magazine this week, Ross Clark places the blame firmly at the door of the water companies for the shortages that we're seeing right now.

0:50.7

Would you agree with him?

0:52.3

I think that you obviously can talk about the drought

0:54.8

and the like, but I think this country should be able to cope with that. I think there has been

0:58.5

a problem of underinvestment. And I mean, that is a problem of the regulatory approach to the water

1:04.0

companies. I think we have this debate where we act as if there are only two models, things can

1:08.3

either be privatised or nationalised. When actually, I think,

1:11.1

you could have privatised utilities, but far more stringent requirements on them to reinvest the

1:16.2

profits that they make back into providing the necessary infrastructure. And I mean, the difference

1:21.9

between a water company and other companies is the householder has no choice who they get their water from. They're in a

1:28.7

particular water area. So there is no market like that. But for that reason, it is essentially a

1:33.2

license to print money. And I think these companies should be required to invest far more than they do

1:39.0

in the infrastructure. I think it is, it is frankly close to scandalous how much water has been lost through leakage

1:45.0

and the fact that we are not building new reservoirs. You know, all of these things, I think,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.