meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Defense Diaries

The Docket Ep.504: Idaho 4 part 4

Defense Diaries

Defense Diaries

True Crime

4.81.9K Ratings

🗓️ 26 May 2023

⏱️ 80 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Bob and Ali discuss the recent updates in the Idaho 4 case. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the Dock, presented by Defence Stars, I am your host Bob Mata, and this

0:29.6

is Idaho 4 update number 4, and I am joined by my beautiful wife and my partner in crime,

0:36.5

actually my partner in all things, Alli Mata, what's up girl, how are you, pretty good,

0:42.5

all right so we're going to knock on the loan these out of the park, you know we did

0:46.0

Idaho 4 last week when he was indicted through the grand jury, and now as of yesterday he was finally

0:55.1

arraigned, and Alli why don't you tell our beautiful listeners just exactly what does

1:01.9

arraigned mean, well I do think you told him this in the last episode but I'm happy to do it again,

1:08.2

an arraignment is just the formal proceeding in which the defendant is advised that the

1:13.4

charges against him and he enters a plea of guilty or not guilty, or in this case stands silent,

1:21.2

which definitely took me by surprise, I was not anticipating frankly, I had never even heard of it,

1:29.2

yeah I mean I think it's something that people used to do like back in the day, you used to just

1:33.6

say I waive formal arraignment and the defendant stands silent in the face of the charges or

1:38.8

you know something along those lines, but yeah in this case it was clearly something the defense team

1:44.8

strategized, discussed and decided to do because it is not something people generally do, yeah as

1:51.6

soon as I heard that it had taken place I obviously immediately googled it and I found out in

1:56.0

short order that it was old timey, it's you know it's like late 1800s, early 1900s, I mean it's been

2:02.0

used as I continued to research it in some other cases more recently, but it's it's typically not

2:10.4

something that is done, it's very rare I would say is a safe safe we would put it for sure, and you

2:16.6

know but the end of the day the effect is the exact same as if he had just said not guilty to all counts

2:22.2

himself, because essentially all the judge did was just do it for him, so you know I mean it's the same

2:29.9

legal effect and there is no impact moving forward at all on any of his trial strategies or anything

2:36.6

of that nature, right? Right, all right so after that you know but I kind of want to get into a

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Defense Diaries, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Defense Diaries and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.