The Debate Goes "Viral"
The Dershow
Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media
4.4 • 1.9K Ratings
🗓️ 9 October 2020
⏱️ 26 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Americans have the right to get straight answers from their candidates and I explore the scary situation that is occurring in my old neighborhood.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | The coronavirus is at the center of what everybody is talking about and thinking about it. |
| 0:08.3 | It was at the center of the debates, the presidential debate and the vice presidential debate. |
| 0:13.5 | It is at the center of what's going on in neighborhoods of New York and other places |
| 0:18.9 | where you're seeing lockdowns and protests against the lockdowns. |
| 0:23.4 | Today on the Dur show I'm going to talk about the debates |
| 0:26.6 | and I'm going to talk about the coronavirus. |
| 0:28.6 | And I'm going to focus on the neighborhood of Brooklyn |
| 0:31.2 | that I grew up in, which now has one of the highest rates of infection |
| 0:35.6 | of coronavirus. |
| 0:36.8 | So today on the Dersh show debates coronavirus and your health. The vice presidential debate the other night was far more civil and informative in many ways than the presidential |
| 0:58.7 | debate, but I think the American public was denied what it was entitled to in the vice presidential debate. |
| 1:06.3 | And that is answers to very hard questions. |
| 1:10.4 | In each case, both the Vice President and the Senator refused to answer absolutely appropriate questions, |
| 1:20.0 | and the moderator didn't press them hard enough to answer the questions. |
| 1:25.0 | Senator Harris was asked quite appropriately, |
| 1:28.0 | would she advocate court packing in the event that the Democrats win the presidency and win the Senate, they could easily |
| 1:36.5 | just by a majority vote and no veto by the president, expand the number of Supreme Court |
| 1:42.4 | justices from nine to 11, 13, 15, 17, 27. |
| 1:48.0 | There's an op-ed in today's New York Times by a writer saying it would be a good idea and what's wrong with a 37 |
| 1:56.2 | member Supreme Court it would allow for more diversity it would allow the court to |
| 2:00.9 | reflect the image of America and the politics of America. It would become |
| 2:06.7 | a Supreme Court more responsive to the political needs of America. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

