meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Sinica Podcast

"The China Debate We're Not Having" | Part 4: The AI Race Reconsidered

Sinica Podcast

Kaiser Kuo

Currentaffairs, Business, News, China Politics, Shenzhen, Chinese, Chongqing, China News, Politics, China, Culture, Sichuan, Hangzhou, Beijing, International Relations, China Economy, Chengdu, Film, Shanghai, Guangzhou

4.7710 Ratings

🗓️ 17 May 2026

⏱️ 36 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This week I’m sharing the fourth and final installment from the day-long conference convened by the Institute for America, China, and the Future of Global Affairs (ACF) at Johns Hopkins SAIS on April 3rd in Washington — “The China Debate We’re Not Having: Politics, Technology, and the Road Ahead.” The first three episodes featured Jessica Chen Weiss’s opening remarks and the panels on what China wants, what the United States wants, and tech rivalry and competing visions of the future. This final installment is a fireside conversation between Henry Farrell and Alondra Nelson, followed by Jessica’s closing remarks.

Once again, my deep thanks to Jessica Chen Weiss, ACF’s inaugural faculty director, for organizing this terrific conference and for so generously letting me share this audio with Sinica listeners.

Henry Farrell, the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Agora Institute Professor of International Affairs at SAIS, sits down with Alondra Nelson — Harold F. Linder Professor of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study and former Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy — for what turns out to be the day’s most generative reframing of the AI race. Henry begins by asking how it is that ideas once confined to 1980s science fiction — the singularity, AGI, brains-in-vats — have come to anchor mainstream American AI policy discourse. Alondra traces the genealogy back to the “Californian ideology” and the long history of outré thinking in Silicon Valley, but her real point is that something has shifted: U.S. negative sentiment around AI has been climbing and plateauing high since 2022, even as adoption has spread — the opposite of the usual technology-acceptance curve, and the opposite of what’s happening in China, Nigeria, or Brazil.

From there the conversation opens up into what I found to be its richest vein: the contrast between a Cartesian, disembodied American conception of AI — “we’re working on the brains,” as Sam Altman put it when OpenAI shut down its robotics team in 2022 — and a more embodied approach that integrates the cognitive and the physical, which is part of what’s powered China’s advances in advanced manufacturing and robotics. Alondra is sharp on the costs of the brain-in-a-vat framing: it treats AI as a state of exception in which existing laws and institutions somehow don’t apply, and it lets us float aspirational claims (”AI will cure cancer”) that elide all the clunky institutional stewardship actually required to get from aspiration to outcome.

She also offers an incisive reading of the Trump administration’s AI policy — which, she argues, is misleadingly described as “deregulatory.” Between export controls, the golden share in Intel, immigration restrictions on STEM talent, and the administration’s tight stewardship of who wins and who loses in the AI ecosystem, this is industrial policy by another name — and a narrowing of democratic input over decisions of enormous infrastructural consequence.

The conversation closes with Henry asking what a small-d democratic successor administration ought to do, and Alondra’s answer is bracingly practical: get rid of the state of exception, take the material supply chain of AI seriously (data centers, electricity, critical minerals, communities), let state-level policy generate evidence about what works, and aim for high-watermark aspirations — North Stars, in the spirit of the AI Bill of Rights — rather than pretending the technology itself will deliver our values.

Jessica then offers her closing remarks, thanking the panelists, previewing the ACF Insights Series, and putting out the call for new junior fellows at the Institute.

Participants:

Alondra Nelson, Harold F. Linder Professor of Social Science, Institute for Advanced Study; former Director, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy

Henry Farrell, Stavros Niarchos Foundation Agora Institute Professor of International Affairs, Johns Hopkins SAIS

Closing remarks: Jessica Chen Weiss, David M. Lampton Professor of China Studies and Inaugural Faculty Director, ACF

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the Cynica podcast, the weekly discussion of current affairs in China.

0:13.0

In this program, we look at books, ideas, new research, intellectual currents, and cultural trends

0:19.2

that can help us better understand what's

0:21.2

happening in China's politics, foreign relations, economics, and society. Join me each week for

0:27.2

in-depth conversations that shed more light and bring less heat to how we think and talk about

0:33.1

China. I'm Kaiser Guo coming to you this week from my nearly empty, soon to be on the market home in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

0:41.4

Cynica is supported this year by the Center for East Asian Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, a national resource center for the study of East Asia.

0:50.2

Listeners, please support my work by becoming a paying subscriber at synecabodcast.com.

0:56.5

I know there are a lot of substacks out there, and they start to add up, but I think this

1:01.7

one delivers serious value, and I do need your help to keep doing this work, so please do subscribe

1:07.5

so I can continue to bring you these conversations.

1:11.5

This week, I'm sharing the fourth and final installment from the Daylong conference convened

1:16.4

by the Institute for America, China, and the Future of Global Affairs, ACF, at Johns Hopkins

1:22.8

School of Advanced International Studies, or SICE.

1:25.9

That was on April 3rd in Washington, and it was called

1:28.9

the China debate we're not having, politics, technology, and the road ahead. The first episode

1:35.8

featured Jessica Ched Weiss's opening remarks, and the panel on what China wants. The second panel

1:42.2

turned to the equally important question of what the United States

1:45.3

wants from China, which is something Jessica has been particularly good at problemizing.

1:50.8

I've often borrowed her language to express the idea that recent American administration

1:55.8

seem somehow unable to articulate an affirmative vision for what the U.S. actually wants things to look

2:01.9

like.

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 8 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Kaiser Kuo, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Kaiser Kuo and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.