meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Libertarian

The Case(s) Against Affirmative Action | Libertarian: Richard Epstein | Hoover Institution

The Libertarian

The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

History, News, Politics

4.7994 Ratings

🗓️ 29 June 2023

⏱️ 26 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

What will universities do now that affirmative action has been declared illegal?

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Libertarian Podcast from the Hoover Institution, and today we're discussing two Supreme Court cases on affirmative action.

0:18.0

I'm your host Tom Church, and I'm joined by the Libertarian Professor Richard Epstein.

0:22.0

Here at Hoover, Richard is the

0:24.0

Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow. He's the Lawrence A. Tish Professor of

0:28.1

Law at NYU and he's also a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago. Now today Richard we're discussing the

0:34.6

Supreme Court's new ruling on affirmative action in university admissions.

0:40.3

University admissions something that I think you actually have some background in history and having been a professor for a decade or two right

0:47.3

55 years alas

0:50.3

That's incredible well Richard we got two opinions today, 63 and 62, effectively ending the consideration of race in college applications. So the cases were regarding Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, so you've got a private and a public university. And Chief Justice Roberts writing the majority opinion wrote, students must be treated based on his or

1:13.7

or horror experiences as an individual, not

1:16.7

on the basis of race.

1:18.3

Now, the reaction to these rulings

1:21.0

has been, I think, what you'd expect, some on some on the right pretty happy some of the left not so much so I'd like to know Richard

1:27.6

You know give us a baseline here. This is not the first affirmative action case that's been decided for the Supreme Court. Where did this, how

1:34.4

is this evolved over time? Well it's evolved very greatly. First of all, let me sort of

1:38.0

of state my position, which is I'm sort of in the middle. And the way I say it facetiously is I want to run the

1:44.4

programs otherwise I don't want to have them. And the point is there are many

1:48.8

complicated tradeoffs that are involved that require sensitive people at the helm.

1:53.0

And the great difficulty that I think we have in trying to come to a consensus

1:57.0

is the Justice Roberts position is not at all,

2:00.0

and the other side is full-stream ahead,

2:02.0

and there's nobody who seems to be in the middle saying yes it's a good but it's traded off against other goods now how does this all begin well and actually begins a long time ago with the adoption of the Equal Protection Clause in 1868.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.