The Case of the Missing Constitutional Violation
Slate News
Slate Podcasts
4.5 • 6K Ratings
🗓️ 26 January 2016
⏱️ 28 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
In Heffernan v City of Paterson, the Supreme Court must decide whether a government worker can be punished for a political belief his employers attribute to him – rightly or wrongly. This week, Dahlia speaks with lawyers on both sides of the topsy-turvy case.
Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Our email is amicus@slate.com.
Subscribe to our podcast here. You can find past episodes of our show here.
Amicus is sponsored by Casper, an online retailer of premium mattresses for a fraction of the price. Casper mattresses come with free delivery and returns within a 100-day period. Get $50 toward any mattress purchase by visiting Casper.com/amicus and using the promo code AMICUS.
Podcast production by Tony Field.
Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Amicus is sponsored by Casper, an online retailer of premium mattresses for a fraction of the price. |
| 0:06.0 | Casper mattresses come with free delivery and returns within a 100-day period. |
| 0:10.2 | And get $50 toward any mattress purchase by visiting casper.com slash amicus and using the promo code amicus. |
| 0:22.1 | Hi and welcome to Amicus, Slate Supreme Court podcast. |
| 0:25.3 | I am Dahlia Lithwick, and I cover the High Court for Slate Magazine. |
| 0:30.9 | So we're coming at you a few days late this week, and for that we blame the snow. |
| 0:36.3 | Here in Virginia now, we're mostly dug out, dusted |
| 0:39.1 | off, and ready to act like serious thinkers rather than just mindless consumers of marshmallows |
| 0:45.1 | and hot liquid chocolate. Now, this week, we decided to focus on a deeply strange. The word |
| 0:50.9 | bizarre was invoked more than once at oral arguments last Tuesday, case involving speech and public employees. |
| 0:58.0 | It's almost creeping up on an encyclopedia Brown mystery, the case of the missing constitutional violation. |
| 1:05.8 | So the case is called Heffernan v. City of Patterson, and it involves a 20-year veteran police officer of the |
| 1:12.8 | Patterson, New Jersey Police Department, who was demoted in 2006 for ostensibly supporting the |
| 1:18.6 | wrong mayoral candidate, except he never supported that candidate or any candidate in the first |
| 1:24.3 | place. It turns out he was just picking up a yard sign for the wrong candidate |
| 1:28.8 | for his bedridden mother. Mistaken identity. Comedy ensues. Confusion. The First Amendment |
| 1:35.9 | question at the heart of Heffernan v. Patterson is this. When you are a public employee, |
| 1:42.1 | do you have a right not to be retaliated against when the city falsely ascribes a political viewpoint to you that you never even had? |
| 1:51.3 | I know, right? |
| 1:53.5 | Joining us today to discuss the case are two of the lawyers involved. |
| 1:57.9 | The first will be Stuart Banner, a legal historian and the Norman Abrams Professor of Law at the UCLA Law School. |
| 2:04.4 | Banner also directs UCLA's Supreme Court Clinic, and he filed this case on behalf of Jeffrey Heffernan, the police officer, who was demoted for his First Amendment speech and values. So welcome to Amicus Stewart Banner. Oh, thanks very much. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

