meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

The Book Club: was Ernest Bevin Labour's Churchill?

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News Commentary, News, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.4785 Ratings

🗓️ 1 July 2020

⏱️ 43 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this week's books podcast I'm joined by Alan Johnson and Andrew Adonis to talk about the latter's new biography of a neglected great of British political history: Ernest Bevin: Labour's Churchill. He was, in Andrew's estimation, the man who did most to save Europe from Stalin. So why has Bevin been so forgotten? In what way was he Churchillian? What would he have made of the current state of the Labour party? And will we ever see his like again?

Click here to try 12 weeks of the Spectator for £12 and get a free £20 Amazon gift voucher.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Get 12 weeks of The Spectator in print and online for just £12.

0:05.2

And we'll give you a £20 £20,000, Amazon Give Voucher, absolutely free.

0:10.0

Go to spectator.com.uk forward slash voucher.

0:20.4

Hello and welcome to The Spectator's Book Club podcast. I'm Sam Leith, the literary editor of The Spectator,

0:26.6

and this week I'm very pleased to be joined by two greats of the modern Labour movement,

0:32.2

Alan Johnson, the former Home Secretary on Gordon Brown, and Andrew or Lord Adonis. And we're talking about a

0:41.0

semi-forgotten great of the Labour movement who is Ernest Bevan. And he's a subject of Andrew's

0:46.6

new biography, Ernest Bevan, Labour's Churchill. Welcome both. Great to be here. Andrew, can I start

0:52.9

with you just say, why do you call him Labour's Churchill?

0:57.5

He was at Churchill's right hand during the war, literally at his right hand. It was Ernie Bevin, who was mobilising the Home Front to a degree I hadn't realised until starting to study him properly while Churchill commanded the battlefront.

1:11.4

He also was a Churchillian figure in two other respects.

1:15.8

He had many of Churchill's personal characteristics, huge brilliance, larger than life, full of contradictions and all of that.

1:22.5

But also, as became very clear to me as I started writing about him, he was an imperialist.

1:27.4

He was very much a Victorian imperialist. He was very much a

1:28.5

Victorian imperialist. He was born in 1881, Churchill was 1875, so they were very similar generationally,

1:37.3

and they had many of the same assumptions. And even though one was obviously an aristocrat and the

1:42.5

other was a labourer's labourer.

1:44.7

They were imbued by many of the same notions.

1:47.5

At the other point, which is really interesting about them socially,

1:50.1

is that though Churchill was the grandson of a Duke and Ernie was a labourer's labourer,

1:56.4

neither of them went to university.

1:58.6

Both of them were in a fundamental sense self-made.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.