meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

The Book Club: Sarah Ogilvie

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News, News Commentary, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.3826 Ratings

🗓️ 20 September 2023

⏱️ 45 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this week's Book Club podcast I'm talking to Sarah Ogilvie about the extraordinary story of the making of the Oxford English Dictionary, as told in her new The Dictionary People: The Unsung Heroes Who Created the Oxford English Dictionary. She tells me why the OED was different in kind from any previous English dictionary, how crowdsourcing made it 'the Wikipedia of its day', and how – as she discovered – quite so many cranks, murderers, perverts and foreigners took such an interest in it.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The Spectator combines incisive political analysis with books and arts reviews of unrivaled authority.

0:06.4

Subscribe today for just £12 and receive a 12 week subscription in print and online,

0:11.8

and get a £20 £20 £1 Amazon gift voucher absolutely free.

0:15.6

Go to spectator.com.uk slash summer.

0:24.4

Hello. co.uk slash summer. Hello and welcome to The Spectator's Book Club podcast. I'm Sam Leith, the literary editor

0:28.8

of The Spectator, and this week my guest is Sarah Ogilvie, whose new book is The Dictionary

0:34.1

People, the Unsung Heroes who created the Oxford English Dictionary. Sarah, welcome.

0:39.8

Now, to start with, I think, to give these unsung heroes a frame and a place in this story,

0:46.8

can you explain a bit about what the structure for the making of the Oxford English dictionary was,

0:52.5

you know, how it differed from previous dictionaries

0:55.3

like Dr. Johnson's and so forth.

0:57.6

So it was 1857 and it was the London Philological Society where three men first proposed

1:05.8

creating a dictionary that included every word in the English language. And this dictionary

1:12.2

was going to be different, as you say, from previous dictionaries, because rather than something

1:16.6

like Johnson's, which was quite a prescriptive dictionary, this was going to be a descriptive

1:21.6

dictionary. This was going to be based on written sources, based on the ways that people actually use words, they wanted to

1:30.6

document every word in the English language, and they were smart enough to realize that trying

1:38.1

to accomplish such a massive task would be quite impossible for a small group of men living in

1:43.6

London or in Oxford.

1:45.3

So they decided to crowdsource it and they opened it up to everyone, not just within Britain,

1:52.1

but actually around the world.

1:54.2

And they asked them to read their local books and gather their local words and write out quotations from those books on small

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.