meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

The Book Club: Richard Dawkins

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News Commentary, News, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.4785 Ratings

🗓️ 28 April 2021

⏱️ 43 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this week's Book Club podcast, Sam is joined by Richard Dawkins to talk about his new book Books Do Furnish A Life: Reading and Writing Science. Richard tells Sam - among much else - what makes science writing (and science fiction) exciting; the questions science can (and can't) answer; why he felt it necessary to invest so much of his time arguing against religion; and why the left recurrent laryngeal nerve of the giraffe is such an odd shape.   

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

To mark the launch of the new Spectator app, we're offering our podcast listeners the chance to try a three-month digital subscription absolutely free.

0:08.3

To subscribe in our flash sale, go to Spectator Co-UK forward slash app offer today.

0:14.1

Hurry though, this offer ends Sunday.

0:27.2

Hello and welcome to Spectator's Book Club podcast. I'm Sam Leith, the literary editor for The Spectator.

0:36.2

And this week I'm very pleased indeed to be joined by Professor Richard Dawkins, whose new book is called Books Do Furnish a Life, Reading and Writing Science. And it's a collection of his essays, some interviews,

0:41.3

reviews, are sort of miscellaneous pieces. But it feels like it has a shape, Richard. I'm

0:46.1

interested in asking you about the shape of this book. You've sort of put it in five chunks.

0:50.7

What was the thought behind that? Well, I have to pay tribute to Gillian Somerskales, who actually did the editing of it.

0:56.9

She did the editing into chunks.

1:00.1

I mean, I'm all for it. I approve of what she's done.

1:03.2

But it was her thinking, not mine, and I shouldn't claim credit for it.

1:08.0

As you said, the book is somewhat miscellaneous, but it is all about books.

1:13.6

Unlike my previous collection, which was called Science in the Soul, which was past essays

1:19.6

of a more general nature, this one is pretty much concerned about books, forwards,

1:24.6

reviews, afterwards, that kind of thing. Plus, as you said, these additional

1:29.0

interviews, conversations with people. Obviously, you know, reading and writing science,

1:35.2

I'd start by talking about writing science. What is it, do you think, that makes science writing,

1:43.0

particularly science writing, addressed to a general audience of the sort that you've spent a lot of time on.

1:49.1

What is it that makes it work and what are the, you know, what are you aiming to achieve and what are the sort of limitations of the form?

1:54.9

What are the difficulties you face?

1:56.4

I think science is inherently fascinating and so we need to be clear we need to sell science as being

2:03.8

something wonderful and something really terrific that's something marvelous that people should

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.