meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

The Book Club: Jonathan Lethem

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

Daily News, News, News Commentary, Society & Culture

4.3826 Ratings

🗓️ 8 November 2023

⏱️ 49 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this week's Book Club podcast, I'm joined by the novelist Jonathan Lethem. Two decades after his breakthrough book The Fortress of Solitude crowned Lethem the literary laureate of Brooklyn, he returns to the borough's never-quite-gentrified streets with the new Brooklyn Crime Novel. He tells me why he felt the need to go back, and talks about race, intimacy, realism, the 'non-fiction novel' – and why he regrets his beef with the critic James Wood.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The Spectator magazine combines incisive political analysis with books and arts reviews of unrivaled authority.

0:07.6

Subscribe today for just £12 and receive a 12 week subscription, in print and online, plus a £20 £20,000, Amazon gift voucher.

0:16.5

Absolutely free. Go to spectator.com.uk forward slash voucher.

0:28.4

Hello and welcome to the Spectator's Book Club podcast. I'm Sam Leith, the literary editor

0:32.9

of The Spectator, and this week my guest is the novelist Jonathan Leitham, whose new book is called Brooklyn

0:39.2

Crime Novel.

0:40.3

Now, for anyone who knows Jonathan's work, Thelke, Brooklyn.

0:43.3

Brooklyn again, Mr. Leitham.

0:45.3

Yeah.

0:46.3

Is it, I mean, there's a sort of sense it is for you what deprivation was for Larkin?

0:50.3

Well, you know, I stayed away for 20 years, so it's not as though I didn't try.

0:57.5

But, you know, the sense I had was, of course, that this book insisted itself upon me in various ways, very slowly over those 20 years that I was avoiding it.

1:07.6

And it comes out of a direct sense that that first, that Fortress of Solitude, the book that I

1:16.1

left off writing about Brooklyn with, was exhaustive. And I mean that in a positive sense,

1:22.5

that I was done, that I'd said everything I knew to say about it. And then gradually seeping over me was this understanding that I was changing.

1:32.1

Brooklyn continued to change, and I had tremendously more to give to the effort if I let myself accept the assignment.

1:40.9

Now, it's called a crime novel, and both of those words are kind of weighted and freighted in the book. I mean, to start with, let's start the second one of them, because in a lot of ways, a lot of what's going down here feels like it could be a different sort of book, could be a memoir, could be an ethnographic or geographical

2:01.7

history of Brooklyn. What made you write this as a sort of nonfiction novel, if you'd accept

2:07.1

that description? And how important was it that the stuff in it was true? Yeah, that's a great question.

2:12.4

Well, you know, nonfiction novel, I relate to that in one sense and that, you know, one of the

2:17.2

novelists that was

2:18.4

defining for me as I came of age was Norman Mailer, who has these books that are done with a kind

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.