meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Deadline: White House

“The abrupt step back”

Deadline: White House

Nicolle Wallace, MS NOW

News, Ms Now, The White House, Versant, Daily News, Government, Politics, Washington Dc, Msnbc, Nicolle Wallace

4.56.4K Ratings

🗓️ 30 June 2023

⏱️ 97 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Nicolle Wallace discusses the Supreme Court rulings that threaten LGBTQ+ rights and overturn President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program, possible additional charges in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation of the ex-president, Republican front-runners sidling up to a far-right parents’ rights group, and more. Joined by: Randi Weingarten, Rev. Al Sharpton, Rachel Laser, Chasten Buttigieg, Andrew Weissmann, Sarah Kate Ellis, Mike Schmidt, David Jolly, Kris Goldsmith and Cornell Belcher.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi, everybody. It's Borkharkin and the East. Consider yourselves warned. It is a top-sea

0:08.8

turvy, live news event kind of day, case in point, in a matter of about two minutes. We

0:14.5

expect to hear from President Joe Biden. He will address the nation live on a number

0:18.6

of topics, not the least of which, is the abrupt step back our country took today away from

0:24.4

fairness and progress toward intolerance and discrimination. In the name of our Freedom of

0:29.6

Speech, the conservative US Supreme Court this morning ruled 63 in favor of a Colorado web designer,

0:36.1

an evangelical named Lori Smith who refused to work on same-sex weddings. The court's

0:41.0

majority said this, but the first amendment protected her from punishment as part of Colorado's

0:46.4

anti-discrimination law. It is a turning point decision that will flip the state of equal protections

0:51.6

on its head. In the near term, it will allow business owners to likewise evade punishment under

0:56.8

similar laws in 29 states, or than half the union, that protect LGBTQ rights in public accommodations

1:03.9

in some form. In the longer term, it could again signal a threat to the landmark decision

1:09.2

of Bergerfeld versus Hodges, the 2015 case establishing the case of same-sex couples to marry.

1:16.4

Don't lose sight of Justice Clarence Thomas as far as that one's concerned. If you're wondering

1:20.8

have the same-sex couple at the center of this first case is doing, whether they're crushed after

1:25.8

being unceramoniously denied basic human decency, that's not necessary because they don't exist.

1:32.1

In court documents, state officials revealed they had no evidence, none, that anyone had ever

1:37.5

asked this website designer to create a website for a same-sex couple or wedding. The whole thing

1:43.2

was a hypothetical. In a movement that was about as grassroots as Astroturf, this particular web designer

1:49.2

was represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group that routinely

1:54.2

argues religious rights cases, like the ongoing one having to do with the miscarriage pill

2:00.3

and abortion pill in the Supreme Court. Here's the president. Let's listen in to him.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nicolle Wallace, MS NOW, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Nicolle Wallace, MS NOW and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.