The 2024 Mailbag Episode [TEASER]

5-4

Prologue Projects

News Commentary, News, Government

4.6 • 3.2K Ratings

🗓️ 14 May 2024

⏱️ 6 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

What to do if you get arrested (not legal advice™), why are the liberal justices just sitting back while conservatives devour the judiciary, and whether or not to vote for Biden - you've got questions, we've got … maybe not "answers," but definitely "responses."

If you're not a 5-4 Premium member, you're not hearing every episode! To hear this and other Premium-only episodes, access to our Slack community, and more, join at fivefourpod.com/support.

5-4 is presented by Prologue Projects. Rachel Ward is our producer. Leon Neyfakh and Andrew Parsons provide editorial support. Our researcher is Jonathan DeBruin, and our website was designed by Peter Murphy. Our artwork is by Teddy Blanks at Chips NY, and our theme song is by Spatial Relations.

Follow the show at @fivefourpod on most platforms. On Twitter, find Peter @The_Law_Boy and Rhiannon @AywaRhiannon.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Did I just put you on the spot like that like all the time? The professors yeah they tend to do that
0:06.0	Socratic method. So if you don't know the answer they're just gonna kick you out.
0:10.0	Hey everyone. This is Leon from Prolog Projects. On this episode of 5 to 4,
0:19.0	Peter, Rianen, and Michael are taking your questions. This is an extremely heightened moment in
0:25.4	American politics and the questions you all sent in very much reflect that. So the
0:30.6	host will be addressing a range of issues, why the liberal justices seem to be taking a
0:35.2	lese fair approach to the conservative takeover of the judiciary, what to do with your vote in the
0:40.0	2024 elections, and why law professors still seem to think it's fine to date
0:45.0	their students. This is 5 to 4, a podcast about how much the Supreme Court sucks.
1:01.0	Welcome to 5 to 4, where we dissect and analyze the Supreme Court cases that have ignored our civil rights, like the Pulitzer Prize Prize Board ignoring journalists in Gaza.
1:03.7	I'm Peter. I'm here with Michael. Hey everybody. And Rianen. Hello.
1:09.1	Congratulations of course to the New York Times. For their 150th consecutive year of winning a
1:16.3	Pulitzer or whatever, just a guess. For their quote wide-ranging and
1:21.4	revelatory coverage of Hamas's lethal attack in southern
1:24.6	Israel on October 7th you know that that coverage was good because for the good
1:29.4	coverage to outweigh the objectively false coverage, that's something.
1:34.4	Yeah.
1:35.1	So again, again, congrats.
1:38.1	Congrats.
1:39.1	Yeah.
1:40.1	Do the New York Times.
1:41.1	Pat on the back of everybody. Great work.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Prologue Projects, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Prologue Projects and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.