4.6 • 3.2K Ratings
🗓️ 21 May 2024
⏱️ 42 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
In the movies, detectives trail a suspect until he messes up and throws his DNA-soaked paper cup into the trash. In real life, they just pretend like they don't understand the word "identify" in order to abuse the 4th Amendment.
If you're not a 5-4 Premium member, you're not hearing every episode! To hear this and other Premium-only episodes, access to our Slack community, and more, join at fivefourpod.com/support.
5-4 is presented by Prologue Projects. Rachel Ward is our producer. Leon Neyfakh and Andrew Parsons provide editorial support. Our researcher is Jonathan DeBruin, and our website was designed by Peter Murphy. Our artwork is by Teddy Blanks at Chips NY, and our theme song is by Spatial Relations.
Follow the show at @fivefourpod on most platforms. On Twitter, find Peter @The_Law_Boy and Rhiannon @AywaRhiannon.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | We'll hear argument next this morning in case 12-2007, Maryland versus King. |
0:07.0 | Hey everyone, this is Leon from Prolog Projects. On this episode of 5 to 4, the hosts are discussing |
0:17.8 | Maryland v King. In this 2013 case, a man was arrested for one crime, his DNA was collected, and then it led to a match for another crime. |
0:28.5 | In his petition to the court, the man argued that running his DNA was an unconstitutional infringement of the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches. |
0:37.0 | The court was unconvinced. |
0:39.0 | The justices ruled it's okay to take the DNA of people arrested who are not yet convicted of a |
0:44.7 | crime. In a five four narrow decision the Supreme Court ruled the taking of an |
0:48.9 | arrestee's DNA does not constitute an unreasonable search. |
0:53.1 | The argument from the court is that collecting DNA is part of the process of identifying an |
0:57.4 | arrestee, even when that person has already been identified. |
1:01.5 | This is 5 to 4, a podcast about how much the Supreme Court sucks. |
1:07.0 | Welcome to 5 to 4 where we dissect and analyze the Supreme Court cases that have |
1:14.8 | canceled our civil liberties like a cowardly university cancelling commencement. |
1:18.4 | I am Peter and I'm here with Michael. |
1:21.6 | Hey everybody. |
1:23.0 | Rianin, a little too busy freeing Palestine to be with us today. |
1:28.0 | Actually, I think she's just sleepy, but that's part of the work. |
1:31.0 | You know? |
1:32.0 | You know, we got to recharge the batteries. |
1:33.8 | Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Who needs to do your job with your best friends? |
1:39.2 | Yeah. When you can just be napping. All right, cut that, Rach, but then send it to R. |
1:44.0 | All right. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Prologue Projects, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Prologue Projects and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.