Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Open the pod bay doors, Howard.

I know you're here to find out if Terence Howard is legitimate.

If you've seen even a clip from his most recent interview with Joe Rogan, I know you'll be fascinated.

And I want to take a sober and deep dive into what he said and debunk where appropriate.

After I watched the interview with you and Brian Keating I realized that you weren't

trying to eviscerate me or anything like that you actually wanted to hear a well put

together argument concerning these things.

I'm the Chancellor's Distinguished Professor of Physics at UC San Diego.

I only tell you that because it's important as we'll see to check your sources.

Now of course experts can be wrong. As Richard

Feynman said, science is the belief in the ignorance of experts, not the

faith in their intelligence. But just because someone has a PhD like me or is a professor like me,

that doesn't necessarily mean that you should doubt them. Now, it doesn't mean you should trust them either. Look at their track record.

You might want to look up what patents do I have,

maybe what articles I've written. But I've also gone on many different popular science programs,

including Lex Friedman, Jordan Peterson, and of course the Joe Rogan experience.

So I'm familiar with the difficulties of communicating science

to a mass audience of lay people.

Welcome to a special episode.

We're going to take a deep dive into Terence Howard and his claims that he made on the Joe Rogan experience in preparation for another a part two episode with my friend Eric Weinstein who actually encountered Terrence on the Jororgan experience

and went through one by one but Eric can sometimes talk in terms that even I find

...