meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Tepe Double Murder & Kohberger WSU Lawsuit: Attorney Eric Faddis Breaks Down Both Cases

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

News, True Crime, News Commentary

3.3907 Ratings

🗓️ 24 January 2026

⏱️ 48 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This week on Hidden Killers, we're examining two cases demanding legal accountability—one criminal, one civil—with former felony prosecutor turned defense attorney Eric Faddis. In Ohio, Dr. Michael McKee faces aggravated murder charges for allegedly executing his ex-wife Monique Tepe and her husband Richard Tepe in their Columbus home. Police say the murder weapon was recovered from McKee's Chicago apartment. His alibi reportedly collapsed. Family members describe eight years of obsession. Faddis analyzes what prosecutors must prove and where McKee's defense team will attack the evidence—from chain of custody issues to the fundamental problem of no eyewitnesses. 

In Washington, the families of Bryan Kohberger's victims have filed a 126-page lawsuit against WSU alleging the university ignored 13 formal complaints against Kohberger before he murdered Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Staff created their own warning systems. A professor allegedly predicted he'd abuse students. The families argue the murders were "foreseeable and preventable." Faddis breaks down the Title IX claims, what "deliberate indifference" means legally, and whether this lawsuit could set precedent for institutional liability nationwide. Two cases. Two paths to justice. One expert analysis.

#TepeMurders #MichaelMcKee #BryanKohberger #WSULawsuit #KayleeGoncalves #MoniqueTepe #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #AggravatedMurder #TitleIX

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brewski, Stacey Cole, and Todd Michaels.

0:10.4

Michael McKee was a vascular surgeon with no criminal record, who allegedly drove 300 miles from Chicago to Columbus to execute his ex-wife and her husband while their two children slept nearby.

0:24.3

The merits lasted seven months. The divorce was finalized in 2017. Police say they found the

0:29.0

murder weapon in McKee's penthouse about 11 days after the killings. He's now facing two counts

0:34.7

of aggravated murder. Charges that could put him away for life without parole.

0:39.9

So what does the prosecution need to prove?

0:43.3

And how do they do it when there are no eyewitnesses?

0:45.5

And the defendant is a smart, successful doctor who's never been in trouble.

0:49.8

Joining us, Eric Fattis, defense attorney, former prosecutor to help us break all this down.

0:57.0

From a legal perspective, let's start looking at all this from the prosecution standpoint.

1:03.4

McKee was initially charged with the murder.

1:06.1

Then it was upgraded to aggravated murder.

1:08.7

What are we talking about here?

1:10.2

What kind of specific elements are going into place when prosecutors upgrade the verbiage there?

1:15.6

And obviously the severity of the crime to aggravated.

1:19.6

What is that signal on how they're framing this case, Eric?

1:22.6

Sure.

1:23.6

So the original murder charge required the prosecution prove that this was an intentional

1:28.6

killing, that he caused the deaths of two people, and that he did that willfully. The aggravation

1:34.6

comes with this added element of prior calculation and design. Some jurisdictions call it premeditation.

1:42.2

It's essentially that he planned this out, that he took measures to build up to this,

1:49.2

and he knew what he was doing and it happened over a period of time.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.