Murdaugh Appeal Goes to Supreme Court: The Clerk Who Convicted Him Is Now a Convicted Criminal
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
True Crime Today
3.3 • 907 Ratings
🗓️ 24 January 2026
⏱️ 23 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
The Murdaugh saga reaches its most critical moment yet. On February 11th, 2026, the South Carolina Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Alex Murdaugh's appeal — and the stakes couldn't be higher.
Becky Hill, the Colleton County Clerk of Court who managed the jury during Murdaugh's six-week murder trial, has pled guilty to perjury, obstruction of justice, and misconduct in office. She admitted to lying under oath at the January 2024 hearing where retired Chief Justice Jean Toal denied Murdaugh's request for a new trial. Now his defense team is asking the Supreme Court to consider that conviction as they decide whether the original trial was fair.
In this episode, we break down both tracks of Murdaugh's appeal. First, the jury tampering allegations: what Becky Hill allegedly told jurors, what investigators found, and why her perjury conviction matters even though she was never charged with tampering. Second, the underlying trial errors: the defense's claim that Judge Clifton Newman allowed prejudicial financial crimes evidence that turned the trial into character assassination.
We explain the federal vs. state standard debate that could determine everything. We walk through what the prosecution is arguing. And we address the uncomfortable reality that even if Murdaugh wins, he's still going to die in prison — he's already serving 27 years for stealing $12 million from his clients.
This isn't about whether Alex Murdaugh killed his wife and son. The evidence against him is substantial. This is about whether the trial that convicted him followed the rules. And when the clerk who ran that trial is now a convicted liar, that's a question the system has to answer.
#AlexMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #BeckyHill #MurdaughAppeal #TrueCrime #JuryTampering #SouthCarolina #MurdaughFamily #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is Hidden Killers with Tony Bruske. |
| 0:03.0 | Here now, Tony Brucey. |
| 0:06.0 | On February 11th, not far away, Alec Murtaugh, will sit in front of five justices at a South Carolina Supreme Court or at the South Carolina Supreme Court. |
| 0:22.2 | It is, there is one. |
| 0:23.5 | This is the big one is where he is going to be at. |
| 0:27.6 | Well, his attorneys make one final argument. |
| 0:31.7 | And the trial that put him away for life, it may be washed away. |
| 0:38.7 | Because they're going to be arguing that that very trial was fundamentally broken. |
| 0:45.7 | And here's the thing. |
| 0:47.7 | They may have a point. |
| 0:49.9 | Not because Murdoch is innocent. |
| 0:51.7 | The evidence against him is substantial. |
| 0:53.9 | His character itself is monstr innocent. The evidence against him is substantial. |
| 0:57.9 | His character itself is monstrous. |
| 0:59.0 | The evidence against him. |
| 1:01.1 | It is what it is. |
| 1:06.6 | Because the woman who read his guilty verdict out loud in that courtroom, |
| 1:10.7 | the clerk of court who is supposed to be a neutral guardian of the process? |
| 1:14.6 | Well, she's since pled guilty to perjury. |
| 1:20.9 | She had been lying under oath at the very hearing that was supposed to determine whether Murdoch got a fair trial, |
| 1:24.5 | and somehow that's still not enough to automatically get him a new one. |
| 1:29.6 | People really don't like Alec Murdo. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

