So today we're going to, we're going to, as already said, look into who killed the lockdown?

Who killed this idea of a effort to suppress, bread?

How?

How did it disappear?

Where did it go?

And who are these experts who are claiming lockdowns are a failure?

Right.

Because I think these are the three questions that need to be

asked, but are unfortunately not being asked whenever you see someone arguing for anti-lockdown measures.

Right. And for example, like, you know, as we were saying, as this might be, you know, this may

seem like a controversial take or something

like that. I mean, I think we're going to call it like the case for lockdowns. But really what we have to,

the way that we have to go through this is what is the case against the case against lockdowns.

Right. Like what is that actually? What are they actually arguing for? Yeah. Because it's been,

it's sort of translated from the,

well, we might need to do a lockdown because things are getting so bad to experts agree that

lockdowns are harmful. And, you know, experts agree that lockdowns are a failure. And we're at this

point right now where we have up to 4,000 people a day dying.

We're on track to exceed the worst modeling expectations of these anti-lockdown researchers and talking heads.

And we're kind of running out of options.

We're in desperate need right now.

Also, if you think about the amount of delayed reporting there is of deaths,

...