whenever libs are freaked out about like, you know, whether Trump's going to beat Biden and the election is in a month or whatever, you always look at it and you go, you can just, you can Jill because your part is completely done, you know, that's important in politics.

But, you know, I mean, even if this is just a hypothetical, we're not talking about whether we have any part in it.

The outcome is still something that affects us.

Oh, it for sure affects us.

Right.

Because the question is like, is this a joke or is it a failed coup to overthrow even the presentation of democracy in America, which would be a big deal for people who host left-wing podcast personally?

Like, I think you're going on a bad list after that.

I don't personally love it.

Yeah.

Here's a, so, like I said earlier, um, in some quarters has been a push to

use this as an excuse to like curtail civil liberties or beef up, the surveillance state.

And I think we know by now that there is a very limited interest that the intelligence community actually has in disrupting

or stopping right-wing extremists.

Historically, it's been about the left because that's who actually threatens the power

distribution in this country.

They have gone after the rights sometimes, but then they'll do things, you know, like in

Waco, but then after Waco, it's like, oh, we can't do that again.

And so they never really followed through on Oklahoma City and went into the compound

where they knew the people who probably planned it were because they didn't want to cause another stir.

But so if there's any more funding, any more illegal framework that is given to law enforcement,

national security agencies, I think that's something that we should oppose.

And to her credit, right, people were already the day after blaming AOC for, you know,

...