meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
TALKING POLITICS

Talking Politics Guide to ... The UK Constitution

TALKING POLITICS

Catherine Carr

News, News & Politics

4.7 • 2.5K Ratings

🗓️ 22 August 2019

⏱️ 30 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

We talk to lawyer and constitutional expert Alison Young about the current pressures on the UK constitution, from Brexit to devolution to political polarisation. Is parliamentary sovereignty still the linchpin of the system? What changed with the arrival of the Supreme Court? Can the constitution survive in its current form?


Talking Points:


How should we think about parliamentary sovereignty in the UK constitutional order?

  • The idea is that legislation enacted by parliament is the highest form of law in the land.
  • Unlike most other systems, the UK does not have a written constitution that is above legislation.


What does this mean for the Union? 

  • In a nutshell, Westminster can still override other parliaments. 
  • The civil convention is the idea that Westminster won’t legislate in the devolved areas or change the devolved structures without the consent of the devolved bodies.
  • But this can’t be legally enforced, and Westminster doesn’t always comply with it.  
  • The UK doesn’t have a federal system: there aren’t the same legal limits on Westminster but there are legal limits on the devolved bodies.
  • In short, the institutions are permanent but their powers aren’t.


Did Parliament limit its sovereign powers when it created the Supreme Court?

  • Parliament could still abolish the court, but that could also trigger a constitutional crisis.
  • It’s not necessarily the Supreme Court that has limited parliamentary sovereignty. 
  • EU law has primacy and direct effect. This is a restriction on parliamentary sovereignty.
  • Another tension is how the courts are beginning to interpret legislation.


Brexit has led to renewed focus on parliamentary sovereignty. On the one hand, we see the reassertion of parliamentary sovereignty against the executive. On the other hand, the Brexiteers see themselves as this very principle from the EU.

  • The Gina Miller case revolved around the tension between the government and parliament—whether the government could trigger Article 50. This case actually reinforced parliamentary sovereignty. 


The referendum created a tension between the sovereignty of the people and the sovereignty of parliament.

  • This is the problem that has not been resolved.


Further Learning:


And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello my name is David Ronserman and this is Talking Politics. Today's Talking Politics

0:10.7

Guide is with Alison Young, Professor of Public Law, talking about the UK Constitution,

0:16.6

why it's under so much strain at the moment and whether it might actually break.

0:25.7

Talking Politics is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books which is celebrating

0:30.3

its 40th anniversary for the next few months with an unimprovable offer. Get a year's subscription

0:36.8

and a limited edition LRB tote bag for just ÂŁ40 by using the URL lrb.me forward slash

0:45.9

birthday.

0:52.9

You should probably start with Parliamentary sovereignty because it's usually said to be what

0:56.9

defines the British Constitution and yet that creates a puzzle which is that means Parliament

1:01.8

can change the thing that it defines. How should we think about the role Parliamentary

1:06.6

sovereignty plays in our Constitution order?

1:09.3

I think we need to think about it by understanding the consequences it has for how we structure

1:14.2

the Constitution. So what it's trying to get across is the idea that legislation enacted

1:19.2

by Parliament is in a sense the highest form of law in the land. So it's not just looking

1:23.8

at this idea that Parliament can make legislation only thing it wants to. It's also this idea

1:28.8

that one Parliament can't say to future Parliament's this is off ground, you can't legislate

1:33.0

in this area. So it means legislation is at the top and it allows Parliament to change

1:37.2

things as it goes through and that has the consequence that unlike most other systems

1:42.3

we don't have a Constitution that is above legislation, we don't have a written Constitution

1:46.9

that's entrenched that says well actually these are things you can't do Parliament, we

1:51.0

allow Parliament itself to say we can enact whatever we want including on constitutional

1:56.0

issues.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.