Jill Lepore on the American Nation
TALKING POLITICS
Catherine Carr
4.7 • 2.5K Ratings
🗓️ 18 August 2019
⏱️ 39 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
We talk to historian Jill Lepore about the idea of nationalism in America, from the birth of the Republic through to Trump. What defines the nation? Why does the illiberal version keep getting the upper hand? Are there any politicians in America who can rescue the idea of liberal nationalism? Plus we ask Jill what she thinks of Johnson, Brexit and nationalism in the UK.
The Union won the American Civil War, but the South won the peace.
- The South won the peace by persuading the North both to undo the terms of Reconstruction and to remember the war as being about something different than it actually was.
- The Confederacy was founded on the premise of racial hierarchy.
- Reconstruction began as essentially a military occupation of the South to reinforce the new amendments to the Constitution guaranteeing equality for all people
- But it was ended prematurely and the federal government wound up conceding the constitutionality of the Jim Crow laws that reenforced racial hierarchy.
When did cities stop being a part of “the nation?”
- To some on the right, there’s no such thing as a liberal nationalism or liberal patriotism.
- Trump sets the nation against the government.
- Historically, the term “globalist” is code for antisemitism.
- The environmentalists may have replaced the old “internationalists.”
The classic error on the left is to speak to either subgroups or the world.
- Looking at the Democratic presidential candidates, you don’t really see anyone talking about what the nation is.
- The concept of the “nation” is now one of the things that divides generations.
- Obama did talk about the nation a lot—this is part of what made him so powerful rhetorically.
There are competing notions of nationalism. On the one hand, you have an enlightened, liberal nationalism, which is about guaranteeing equal rights to citizens. On the other, there is illiberal nationalism, which is premised on exclusion.
- Right now, illiberal nationalism seems to have the upper hand.
Further Learning:
- Jill on why America needs a new national story
- What if Reconstruction hadn’t failed?
- David Blight on the Civil War and Reconstruction, 1845-1877 (Open Yale Courses)
- America First?
And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, my name is David Ronserman and this is Talking Politics. Today we're talking |
| 0:10.8 | to one of the leading historians of America, Jill LaPore, about her new book. It's called |
| 0:16.7 | This America, The Case for the Nation. |
| 0:25.8 | Talking Politics is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books, which is celebrating |
| 0:30.5 | its 40th anniversary for the next few months with an unimprovable offer. Get a year's subscription |
| 0:37.0 | and a limited edition LRB tote bag for just 40 pounds by using the URL lrb.me forward slash |
| 0:46.1 | birthday. |
| 0:53.1 | We recorded this conversation a few days ago. I'm in my office in Cambridge. She was in |
| 0:57.3 | her office in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard. We're going to get onto Brexit towards the |
| 1:02.7 | end because nationalism matters for our story too. But we started at the heart of the American |
| 1:08.5 | story of the nation and that's the Civil War. I think I'd like to start not at the beginning |
| 1:14.8 | of the story but with the Civil War because reading your book, it just seems that that's |
| 1:20.4 | so much at the heart of the story even now. So I'd like to ask a question which I'm aware |
| 1:26.0 | is a kind of slightly naive outside this question about a complicated history. But if in the Civil |
| 1:32.5 | War, one side, the Unionist side was fighting to defend the nation and Lincoln in the Gettysburg |
| 1:39.1 | address uses the nation five times. I read it last night and I counted. He's on the side of the |
| 1:44.4 | nation and the other side are trying to break up the nation. How do we end up with a situation |
| 1:50.3 | where the winners, the people fighting for the nation, lose claims over the nation to the |
| 1:56.2 | losers? How did the losers get to be the ones who say what the American nation is? That's a great |
| 2:02.2 | question and the short answer is the Union that is the North won the war, but the South that is |
| 2:09.4 | the Confederacy won the peace. And what I mean by that is if we think of the war as you say as a |
| 2:16.6 | war between the Union that's trying to preserve the Union and the idea of the nation state and |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

