meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Modern War Institute

Sweden, Finland, and NATO

Modern War Institute

John Amble

Government, News

4.7 • 798 Ratings

🗓️ 24 August 2023

⏱️ 39 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The decisions by the governments of Sweden and Finland to apply to join NATO marked a major departure from both countries' longstanding policies of nonalignment. But how, specifically, will it affect these countries’ defense capabilities—and those of NATO? How much needs to be done to achieve interoperability? And most fundamentally, while Russia’s invasion of Ukraine clearly triggered these decisions, why did both countries make this major decision at the particular moment they did? To unpack those questions and many more, John Amble is joined on this episode by Rasmus Hindren, the head of international relations at the European Center of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats, a senior nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council, and an experienced defense policy practitioner in his home country of Finland.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

For Finland, the neutrality was always a pragmatic choice, especially during the Cold War.

0:14.0

Still, Russia is a big neighbor and it's a very unpredictable neighbor.

0:19.5

And I think what happened with the invasion of Ukraine has

0:24.4

shown that that kind of unpredictability is really, really difficult to live with as Russia's

0:30.3

neighbor. Hey, welcome back to the Modern War Institute podcast. I'm John Amble, editorial director at

0:37.7

MWI, and this episode features a conversation about a subject very much in the news right now,

0:43.0

the decisions by the governments of Sweden and Finland to apply to join NATO.

0:47.6

For both countries, this step marks a major departure from longstanding policies of non-alignment.

0:53.2

But what will it actually mean for these countries' defense capabilities and for NATO?

0:57.0

What about interoperability?

0:59.0

What does it look like from a nuclear deterrence perspective and from the standpoint of conventional forces?

1:04.0

And while Russia's invasion of Ukraine obviously triggered these decisions, why now?

1:09.0

There are a ton of interesting and really important questions

1:12.8

to unpack, and to do so, I'm joined on this episode by Rasmus Hindran. He is the head of

1:17.2

international relations at the European Center of Excellence for Countering hybrid threats

1:20.9

and a senior non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council. He also has some really relevant

1:26.2

experience working on defense policy in his

1:28.5

home country of Finland. It is a great opportunity to hear a perspective from one of the two

1:33.1

likely future NATO members. Before we get to it, though, just a couple quick notes. First,

1:38.0

if you aren't following MWI and social media, you can find us on Twitter, Facebook, or LinkedIn.

1:42.8

And second, as always, what you hear in this episode

1:45.1

are the views of the participants and don't represent those of West Point, the Army, or any other

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Amble, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of John Amble and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.