meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Advisory Opinions

Squirrely Religious Expression

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Government, Politics

4.7 • 4K Ratings

🗓️ 20 June 2024

⏱️ 60 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Awaiting a week full of emergency pods, Sarah and David discuss latest round of SCOTUS opinions and take a look at a religious expression case. The Agenda: —Your foreign earnings are taxable —Malicious prosecutions, do they fall under the charge-specific rule or any-crime rule? —The Fifth Circuit was wrong —Defining expert testimony —Louisiana's Ten Commandment's law Show Notes: —Georgia Tech sued over speech code —History of the Lemon test Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You ready?

0:02.0

I was born ready. Welcome to Advisory opinions. I'm Sarah Isger, that's David French, and yep, we got four Supreme Court decisions on

0:26.0

Thursday morning. We are expecting more on Friday morning where we will do another podcast.

0:30.5

Look, are these four the most exciting for Supreme Court decisions ever to come down?

0:35.8

No, they're not. But are there interesting tidbits that will make a podcast?

0:41.7

One way or another another yes they are so David I thought we'd

0:46.6

start with the 16th Amendment case this is the Moore case and you know like

0:51.6

Julie Andrews taught us let's start at the very beginning.

0:55.2

The 16th Amendment says, the Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on

1:01.2

incomes from whatever source derived without apportionment

1:06.1

among the several states and without regard to any census or enumeration.

1:11.6

And I'll tell you what I love about this Moore decision which was

1:17.3

written by Justice Kavanaugh with a Jackson concurrence, a Barrett concurrence joined by Alito, and a dissent by Justice Thomas joined by Justice Gorsuch.

1:30.6

So it was 7-2 of a sort, is not so much the outcome of this case, but actually just

1:38.8

learning a lot about the history of the 16th Amendment. I feel smarter for having read all this. So I thought

1:45.2

I'd give listeners just a little tidbit of some of the fun 16th

1:49.6

amendment history. So of course we get this great history from Justice Thomas and his dissent and it's going to start with the Declaration of Independence, right?

1:56.6

Because taxes are a big part of the reason why we declared independence taxation without representation, right? then we have the Declaration of Independence,

2:05.2

we win that war, then we have the Articles of Confederation

2:08.4

where basically the federal government has zero actual ability to raise taxes from people. They can like ask the

2:15.1

states nicely for money. Turns out that wasn't working too well. The states were

2:19.2

like new phone who discs, we'll get to it later, the checks in the mail.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.