You ready?

I was born ready. Welcome to advisory opinions. I'm Sarah Isger. That's David French and we've got Rahimi David.

We have Rahimi. We have Rahimi and I missed it earlier because I was looking at the court and I saw all of the earlier cases which were not as exciting as

Rahimi and then I thought well we're done because I saw that R number come up

that that indicates you're done and I just missed Rahheimi. I just didn't see it. But it was there and it was glorious.

So I can't wait to talk about it. So we'll talk about the other cases as well and just run through them.

One of them turned out to be a case that we did not

talk about after the oral argument and is kind of a sleeper important decision as it turned

out. That's the Munoz case so we'll get to that. All right, Rahimi 8-1 with Justice Thomas as the lone

dissenter, the Chief Justice writing the opinion. And for those just tuning into

advisory opinions,

Rahimi is a case about the Second Amendment, about guns.

It's sort of the follow-on in a lot of ways

to be lineage of Heller, individual right to bear arms.

McDonald, it incorporates the Second Amendment

against the states.

Bruin, you have an individual right

to bear those arms.

That was about May issue licenses versus shall issue licenses

striking down New York's May issue.

And that's where the text history and tradition thing really came up.

And that takes us to Rahimi.

...