The Spectator magazine combines incisive political analysis with books and arts reviews of unrivaled authority. absolutely free. Go to spectator.com.uk forward slash voucher.

Hello, I'm Sam Holmes and welcome to Spectator Out Loud.

Every week a few of our favourite writers read their pieces from the latest issue.

This week we'll hear from Douglas Murray on the political fate of the US Vice President Kamala Harris,

Mary Wakefield on her experiences during Storm Arwin and the subsequent media coverage,

and Peter Hitchens on his fears regarding the future of the city of Oxford.

First up, Douglas Murray.

Does Kamala Harris deserve to be vice president?

Is it rude to refer to the vice president of the USA as the world's most famous diversity hire?

Possibly, but it is the same with so many things that are true.

You needn't take my word for it. Joe Biden made his selection priorities clear when he was confirmed as his party's nominee last year.

He immediately declared that his search for a running mate was going to focus on non-white women.

And in some ways it was a savvy move.

Like John McCain in 2008, he knew that the US press might not thrill to a

ticket made up of a couple of white male, soon-to-be, octogenarians. Yet, the decision left him

with a relatively small list of qualified people to choose from. It would be the same

if he'd decided that his running mate had to be a gay. It inevitably shrinks the talent

pool and turns the focus from aptitude to identity. So it was that Biden ended up choosing Kamala Harris, a senator and former state

attorney general who had distinguished herself most in the primaries by attacking him as a racist.

On the sole occasion this was raised after she joined the ticket, Harris laughed her special laugh.

You are lucky if you have not heard this laugh. It is of a type rarely heard outside a penitentiary,

a sort of wild, false, exaggerated impersonation of how a human being might laugh.

...