Solving one of cosmology's biggest conundrums with Wendy Freedman
The Origins Podcast with Lawrence Krauss
Lawrence M. Krauss
4.4 • 592 Ratings
🗓️ 21 August 2024
⏱️ 117 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Wendy Freedman, the former director of the Carnegie Observatories and now distinguished professor at University of Chicago, has been a leading figure in observational cosmology and astronomy for over 30 years. I have known her as a friend and colleague, and have learned much from her over the years, and was very excited to be able to snag her amidst her busy schedule to record a podcast a week or two before the release of a new blockbuster result her team had produced. I am very happy that Critical Mass listeners will be among the first to get the detailed lowdown on the likely resolution of a problem that has been plaguing cosmology for the past decade.
In the 1990’s Wendy led a major international team of astronomers in carrying the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project. The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) was named in part because of this project, to establish the distance scale of the universe and measure its current expansion rate, a quantity not coincidentally called the Hubble Constant, first measured by Edwin Hubble in 1929.
Since that time, different groups have measured this most important single observable in our universe and gotten widely different values. In the 1980’s and early 90’s two different groups got values that differed by a factor of 2, even though each claimed errors of less than 10%. In 2001, Freedman’s team published their result, truly accurate to 10%, and the value, perhaps not surprisingly, fell right in the middle between the previous two discrepant values.
All was good, until inferences based on the Cosmic Microwave Background, the most precise observable in modern cosmology suggested that measurements at a time when the universe was 300,000 years old, when extrapolated forward using the best current theory of cosmology today, would give a value that different from the HST value.
The difference was statistically significant, and as time proceeded, and error bars got smaller, the discrepancy between the HST (and then the James Web Space Telescope (JWST)) measurement, and the CMB measurement got more significant. Was our current model of cosmology simply wrong?
Such was the claim in various places over the past few years. Most recently, Wendy led a team to measure cosmic distances in 3 different ways using JWST, and as she describes in our discussion, it looks like the problem may now be solved, although not without leaving other mysteries.
We talked about a lot more than this though. Wendy’s background, what got her into astronomy, her experiences throughout her career, and her leadership in a new project building the Giant Magellan Telescope, what will be the largest telescope in the world in Chile.
The discussion was as fun as it was exciting. Wendy is a wonderful popular expositor, and as always, I really enjoyed talking to her. Tune in to hear, for the first time, about the newest and most important recent result in cosmology from one of my favorite colleagues and a world class scientist.
As always, an ad-free video version of this podcast is also available to paid Critical Mass subscribers. Your subscriptions support the non-profit Origins Project Foundation, which produces the podcast. The audio version is available free on the Critical Mass site and on all podcast sites, and the video version will also be available on the Origins Project YouTube.
Get full access to Critical Mass at lawrencekrauss.substack.com/subscribe
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hi, and welcome to the Origins Podcast. I'm your host Lawrence Krause. In this episode, |
| 0:13.9 | I had the remarkable chance to talk to one of my favorite scientists, an old friend, and one of the |
| 0:19.0 | most well-known and accomplished observational |
| 0:22.3 | astronomers alive today, Wendy Friedman, who's now at the University of Chicago. She was the |
| 0:26.7 | director of the Carnegie Observatories for many years, almost 30 years working there. And she's |
| 0:31.6 | been involved in some observations of the most important features of cosmology, in particular, the measure of something |
| 0:39.0 | called the Hubble constant. Something measured by Edwin Hubble, the first observation in 1929 and |
| 0:45.0 | 1930 that the universe was expanding. And you might think, well, we've observed the universe is |
| 0:49.5 | expanding. Why do we have to keep looking at it? Because that number is central to our understanding of how the universe works. |
| 0:56.2 | And in particular, for anyone who's read the newspapers, |
| 1:01.3 | there seems to have been attention. |
| 1:03.4 | We're measuring this expansion rate of the universe two different ways |
| 1:07.0 | by looking at the very early universe and using theory to propagate forward to get what you should measure today, |
| 1:14.2 | and then measuring it today gave different numbers. |
| 1:17.4 | Different numbers that didn't seem to differ by very much, by one or two percent, |
| 1:21.0 | and you might think, well, that's good. |
| 1:22.5 | But the observers in each case claimed that they were measuring things to much better accuracy |
| 1:27.3 | and the disagreement was significant. |
| 1:29.3 | And if that disagreement is real, then some people have argued you might require vastly new physics. |
| 1:36.3 | And because you're extrapolating from the early universe to the present universe by using the physics we now understand. |
| 1:43.3 | And if that leads to disagreement with you actually observe today, |
| 1:47.7 | then maybe the physics we think we understand is not what it was. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Lawrence M. Krauss, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Lawrence M. Krauss and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

