meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

SIO484: Lawsuit Alleges Voting Irregularities in 2024. Is There Any There There?

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Atheist, Opinion, Harvard, News, Politics, Legal, Law, Liberal, Supremecourt

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 1 July 2025

⏱️ 49 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Hey folks, I'm taking a little time off! Hope you enjoy this SIO in the meantime.
Thank you!

Part 1: The Legal Stuff

Dr. Jenessa Seymour is here to break down something that even our moms are spreading on social media: a group in New York claims to have uncovered discrepancies in the vote count for the 2024 election, and they're suing over it! Dr. Seymour hits ALL of the expert boxes for this one - statistics, voting rights, the law, and New York.

Want part 2 early? Head to Patreon.com/seriouspod!

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hey, opening arguments, listeners, it's Thomas.

0:02.9

Not sure why I did that way. That was weird. It's Thomas here. Just wanted to let you know that I'm taking a much needed, I could say week, but I'll be honest, I kind of think I still want to do a rapid response Friday. There's too much going on. That's a problem. Too much going on. Going on a little trip, going on a little me trip, getting a slight amount of time off, hopefully.

0:22.2

Maybe can unwind for approximately three and a half minutes and then hopefully.

0:26.5

But I wanted to jump on to tell you that and also to post something that is up on serious inquiries only,

0:33.0

but I can post it for you here if you're not a subscriber over there because it's very relevant,

0:37.2

I promise.

0:37.7

It is expert, Dr. Janessa Seymour, the perfect expert, as you'll hear me explain, to break down

0:44.0

the claims of election irregularities in 2024.

0:48.5

Yeah, this is, it's definitely nowhere near the magnitude of 2020 and the claims made there.

0:53.3

But there's a sizable

0:54.6

chunk of people who are open to this theory that has been put forth in a lawsuit that has

1:01.4

overcome a motion to dismiss, which I think lends it some credibility in people's minds.

1:05.8

And it turns out the claims are from an area, like a physical area, geographical area in New York,

1:12.6

that is exactly where Janessa has experience.

1:16.0

And Janessa, again, not only brilliant PhD, she also pivoted and became a lawyer recently and does work in voting rights.

1:24.7

She's great.

1:25.3

She's been on here and there.

1:26.5

You probably remember her. But she's fantastic. And I thought this is a great thing for opening arguments, listeners to hear. If you want to hear the part two, head over to the serious inquiries only feed. It'll be up tomorrow at some point. You could go to that Patreon if you want to get it right away. But this is part one, which is kind of the legal stuff anyway. So it's

1:44.9

talking about that and it's talking about in general the claims and kind of how we should be

1:48.8

thinking about them off the bat. So hope you enjoy this. We'll be back with regularly scheduled

1:53.5

OA. Probably it'll be Friday. Let's be on. If I can make myself not work, it'll maybe not be

1:59.2

Friday. But it's also not really that much work.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.