Welcome back to Buckeye Talk, another Monday madness with Cleveland dot com on Nathan

Baird along with Doug Lamarice. We are starting off as you do every Monday looking back at

Ohio State's 3324 victory over Penn State. We asked the question for those of you who

don't follow our YouTube channel. Ask the question after the game. Was this a good win for

Penn State? And Doug, after you went back and rewatched this game, did you come away with

more of a concrete opinion, either way, was it a better or worse or when for the Buckeyes?

You said, was it a better win for Penn State? Was it a better win for Ohio? Oh, sorry, yes,

I'm in Ohio State, yes. So I only rewatched the offensive side of the ball up through the

Trevon Henderson, gigantic run that kind of gave them the breathing room that they needed at the end.

And so this was my first live double dip weekend of the season where I watched the Buckeyes

in person on Saturday and the Browns in person on Sunday. And when I watched the Browns

on Sunday, you know, working on a story on this, I didn't think a single Brown skill player

like made a play in that game against the Steelers. Nobody got like an extra five yards

on their own. Nobody broke a tackle. Nobody made like a really tough catch. Nobody made

a cut and juke the guy out of his cleats. If it was schemed open, it was there and they took

it, but it was all efficiency and no explosiveness. On a team that should have some explosiveness,

the Browns should. Ohio State did what the Browns did it and they were both playing really

good defenses. And I think it's okay for Ohio State to sort of rely on that because this

was confirmation on Saturday that it still is always going to be there. Maybe not as frequently

play to play as it is against Akron or Rutgers or Maryland or Indiana. But deep ball play

action to Chris Olave for touchdown. That was there when they needed it. Jackson Smith

Najigbra break a tackle and run 50 yards there when they needed it. And then as long as

...